What does this PSA 8 1934 Goudey Gehrig grade today ?
4for4
Posts: 675 ✭✭✭
Forum members on ignore
Erba - coolstanley-dallasactuary-SDsportsfan
daltex
0
4for4
Posts: 675 ✭✭✭
Comments
PSA 5-6
PSA 6
6 if you submit , perhaps 7 for others.
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
6
7
4
buying O-Pee-Chee (OPC) baseball
6
7
That's probably a 4 today.
And that would be WRONG.
changed my answer and my mind. Vote for 4 . toning on the back.
I bet if I' d have subbed that card back when , it would have gotten an N-something tag
Card saw a doctor. My personal opinion
5-6
Probably should never have received an 8
And this thread explains where the hobby has gone a bit off the rails... I have a pile of vintage stuff I would send in but not until grading comes back to giving the card it's proper grade. My fault I guess for not sending them in decades ago but that SHOULD NOT matter.
Mark
8, it's already graded.
should have graded a 7 when submitted 25 years ago. would grade a 7 today eventually if it didn't cost so much to grade today. that's the huge difference from now and then, for cards in between grades like this one you could submit is 5 times in 3 months for $25 a pop and get the higher grade eventually if it didn't the first few times. now who is going to do that at $300-500 a pop .....
Agreed
This is exhibit A is to why I am unable to take Baseball card collecting seriously
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
On a good day.....PSA 3
On a typical day......... PSA 2
chaz
if it's based on it's age I would say 6. If not than 5 or 6 depending on the number of clouds in the sky. LOL!!
I just saw a 34 Fritsch on EBay in PSA 4 that looks better than that card
6 or 7
George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.
If the present tread continues, the grade opinions for this card will be consistent with Senator Blutarsky's GPA while at Faber College...
Seriously... this is one beautiful card that warrants much greater appreciation.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
What? I don’t think anyone was saying anything other than today’s grading standards are quite different then when this card was graded 20+ years ago