Home U.S. Coin Forum

1993 d Lincoln cent 2.5 g die crack? Lamination?

Comments

  • Yes I know it's in bad shape but pretty cool find I think.?

  • jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 3,602 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Suppose that someone scratched a coin with a sharp knife or razor blade or similar object. In what ways would that look different from this coin?

    (Hint: that's a trick question)

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Corroded junk, nothing more.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • IkesTIkesT Posts: 3,199 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely not cool at all.

  • GreenstangGreenstang Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not a die crack, it is PMD. Someone has scratched the coin.
    Worth 1 cent.

  • The marks on the left are ridges not cuts

  • Picture quality not that great but the V on the left of Lincoln is an indentation the lines are ridges the line on the right is convex

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,365 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Johnsnow said:
    Picture quality not that great but the V on the left of Lincoln is an indentation the lines are ridges the line on the right is convex

    You are free to believe what you like, but the photos you have supplied do not suggest that you are correct.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • Thanks for your opinions I will keep them in mind

  • Don't know if it helps but I added another photo from a different angle this is from the left side of Lincoln one of the con caved ridgelines

  • So one of the lines on the left most definitely looks like some kind of gouge mark I try not to be bullheaded

  • maymay Posts: 1,585 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Johnsnow said:
    The marks on the left are ridges not cuts

    That’s gunk.

    Type collector, mainly into Seated. -formerly Ownerofawheatiehorde. Good BST transactions with: mirabela, OKCC, MICHAELDIXON, Gerard

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,837 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It’s all PMD, including the scratch, obviously

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors
    for PCGS. A 49+-Year PNG Member...A full numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022
  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,896 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you really want to engage in the hobby, you'll be far better served by buying some good reference books on coins you're interested in than looking at junk coins with a microscope.

  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,910 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The fact that you put the weight of the coin in the post tells me you've likely been watching YouTube for numismatic information.

    Minor variances in weight are normal, despite what YouTube says. Unless the coin is visibly affected (too thick or too thin, weak details from being too thin, wrong color), or is a transitional year (1983, 1982-D Small Date) it is not necessary to weigh your coins.

    You have the top experts in the error field posting here (Fred Weinberg is THE top expert) and you will learn far more listening to them than anything you'll see on YouTube.

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 34,558 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Johnsnow said:
    So one of the lines on the left most definitely looks like some kind of gouge mark I try not to be bullheaded

    When you run a sharp edge down a metal object, it creates a furrow. The displaced metal creates a ridge. Looks like a plowed field.

    I see nothing in those photos other than damage and corrosion. But keep looking.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file