1960-D Lincoln Cent D over D Conformation Please
![OAKSTAR](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/userpics/L0MTTNKGCUFL/n4EE9PYQ7J9KC.png)
The angle, lighting and focus wasn't easy. What do you think?
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
1
Comments
Looks like a 1960D-1MM-003
https://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1960&die_id=1960d1mm003&die_state=eds
Check the link and other die markers on the coin.
https://www.smallcopperguy.com
Great! That's it! Thanks @Dropdaflag!
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
There are many, many repunched mint marks from Denver in 1960. It can be nauseating pinning down the right attribution
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
And that's probably why it just crossed my mind to throw it back. 😉
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
No way, keep it! Still a nice repunched mint mark in good shape
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
Okay, will do.
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
I don't know what you peeps do, but I have a place set aside for coins like the OP's.
These are just anomaly coins that aren't rare, Like die chips, minor RPMs, and visible abrading, to mention a few.
They are good conversation pieces, especially if you point out where the problem lye's to your guest.
I dunno. That's what I do. Seems to show some stuff that happens as a die wears.
Pete