Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Bought the card, not the holder on a tough 1966 Topps High Number

BaltimoreYankeeBaltimoreYankee Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

I’ve been enjoying my latest challenge of collecting all the high numbers in the 1966 Topps baseball set. I’ve learned some cards are a lot tougher than others. I came across this Grant Jackson PSA 5 on eBay and thought it looked a lot better so I placed a bid on it and won. I think it is really nice for a 5 as I can’t see any obvious flaws that would bring it down that low. I know I'd be pretty bummed with a 5 if I submitted it.


Daniel

Comments

  • markmac33markmac33 Posts: 51 ✭✭

    Dang. That’s nice.

  • JBrulesJBrules Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great looking PSA 5. Congrats.

  • fmclaug11fmclaug11 Posts: 326 ✭✭✭

    Beauty!

  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 11,793 ✭✭✭✭✭

    SWEET!

    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
  • countdouglascountdouglas Posts: 2,436 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes, this is a tough one to find in that sweet spot of condition/price, and was the last card that I needed when completing my raw 66 set. Congratulations for scratching that one off the list with such a nice example.

  • tigerdeantigerdean Posts: 910 ✭✭✭

    Crazy thing is that particular card is not all that low of a pop and still commands good money as opposed to some of the other high number short prints. I don't get it.

  • BaltimoreYankeeBaltimoreYankee Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for the comments guys. I figured there must be a wrinkle or something that didn't show on the scans but there's really nothing I can see.
    Dean - I hear you on the price of this card - seems much higher than most of the short prints. I was watching one that Greg Morris had and it went for $502 raw!

    Daniel
Sign In or Register to comment.