1960 d small date over large date straight from mint
DavidnGinnie
Posts: 5 ✭
in Q & A Forum
Lincoln's cent
0
Comments
1960 d small date over large date never been touched
Not sure what your saying?> @DavidnGinnie said:
Maybe add more to it,
@DavidnGinnie Welcome, if you'd like comments on a particular coin, you'll need to provide cropped, in focus pics of both sides of a coin. Good luck. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
The 6 ?
Looks like post mint damage.
Other than owning a graded (MS65 Red) version of this coin, I'm no expert. But I see things in my coin, clearly showing the small date over the large date (particularly the "9", the "6" and the "0," and the two "D" mint marks) that are not present in your photos.