Home Q & A Forum

1960 d small date over large date straight from mint

Lincoln's cent

Comments

  • 1960 d small date over large date never been touched

  • AbehunterAbehunter Posts: 286 ✭✭✭

    Not sure what your saying?> @DavidnGinnie said:

    1960 d small date over large date never been touched

    Maybe add more to it,

  • Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DavidnGinnie Welcome, if you'd like comments on a particular coin, you'll need to provide cropped, in focus pics of both sides of a coin. Good luck. Peace Roy

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken

  • emeraldATVemeraldATV Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Abehunter said:
    Not sure what your saying?> @DavidnGinnie said:

    1960 d small date over large date never been touched

    Maybe add more to it,

    The 6 ?

  • CoffeeTimeCoffeeTime Posts: 92 ✭✭✭

    Looks like post mint damage.

  • 124Spider124Spider Posts: 897 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 17, 2022 9:08PM

    Other than owning a graded (MS65 Red) version of this coin, I'm no expert. But I see things in my coin, clearly showing the small date over the large date (particularly the "9", the "6" and the "0," and the two "D" mint marks) that are not present in your photos.

Sign In or Register to comment.