Home U.S. Coin Forum

Fake NGC 1921 MS67 ON EBAY

joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 23, 2022 6:24PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Comments

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,146 ✭✭✭✭✭


    peacockcoins

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,647 ✭✭✭✭✭

    “Fake” or genuine lower grade example?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • IkesTIkesT Posts: 3,229 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "The current offer is for the NGC-certified superb gemstones." :D

  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,405 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Located in Suraburi. Not exactly the numismatic capital of Thailand.


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "Certificate no longer valid: Removed from holder"

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    i hope it is, the holder/insert was starting to worry me the quality had finally became too good.

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,647 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Aotearoa said:
    "Certificate no longer valid: Removed from holder"

    That’s odd - when I looked up the cert number, it showed:
    “This item cannot be found. Please check that the NGC certification number was entered correctly. More help >”

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • justmenutty72justmenutty72 Posts: 394 ✭✭✭

    Someone bit at $521🤦🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️👎

  • Cranium_Basher73Cranium_Basher73 Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Two port visits to Pattaya. Bangkok was only about halfway to Suraburi. Last was in March 95 for Cobra Gold exercises. Numismatics wasn't on our minds.

    Throw a coin enough times, and suppose one day it lands on its edge.

  • spyglassdesignspyglassdesign Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I always check the codes on graded ones, and raw coins I always have my reputable and reliable local dealer authenticate immediately upon delivery.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,647 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @spyglassdesign said:
    I always check the codes on graded ones, and raw coins I always have my reputable and reliable local dealer authenticate immediately upon delivery.

    Unless there’s a good enough accompanying image, checking the cert number is far from adequate protection. There are many counterfeit coins in counterfeit holders, which include legitimate ID numbers on counterfeit grading labels.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • TxCollectorTxCollector Posts: 433 ✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @spyglassdesign said:
    I always check the codes on graded ones, and raw coins I always have my reputable and reliable local dealer authenticate immediately upon delivery.

    Unless there’s a good enough accompanying image, checking the cert number is far from adequate protection. There are many counterfeit coins in counterfeit holders, which include legitimate ID numbers on counterfeit grading labels.

    @MFeld or anyone else, what is the lowest value coin that you’ve seen someone counterfeit? For a some of my recent eBay purchases there aren’t accompanying images to go along with the cert but if it’s the case where it’s not worth the effort to make slabbed fakes of say a large cent valued at $150 then that makes me feel better.

    Thanks in advance.

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @Aotearoa said:
    "Certificate no longer valid: Removed from holder"

    That’s odd - when I looked up the cert number, it showed:
    “This item cannot be found. Please check that the NGC certification number was entered correctly. More help >”

    That is odd. I just tried it again with the same result as mentioned.

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • ifthevamzarockinifthevamzarockin Posts: 8,902 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jeffas1974 "what is the lowest value coin that you’ve seen someone counterfeit?"

    I have seen common date Mercury dimes.

  • ifthevamzarockinifthevamzarockin Posts: 8,902 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No holder, they were raw.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,647 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jeffas1974 said:

    @MFeld said:

    @spyglassdesign said:
    I always check the codes on graded ones, and raw coins I always have my reputable and reliable local dealer authenticate immediately upon delivery.

    Unless there’s a good enough accompanying image, checking the cert number is far from adequate protection. There are many counterfeit coins in counterfeit holders, which include legitimate ID numbers on counterfeit grading labels.

    @MFeld or anyone else, what is the lowest value coin that you’ve seen someone counterfeit? For a some of my recent eBay purchases there aren’t accompanying images to go along with the cert but if it’s the case where it’s not worth the effort to make slabbed fakes of say a large cent valued at $150 then that makes me feel better.

    Thanks in advance.

    I don’t recall specifically the lowest value counterfeit coins I’ve seen in counterfeit holders, but would guess they were a minimum of mid to upper three figures.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,656 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Reported.

    thefinn
  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lowest value in a genuine holder:

    Was listed for $100.00.

  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @IkesT said:
    "The current offer is for the NGC-certified superb gemstones." :D

    Did anyone record the seller's name?

  • IkesTIkesT Posts: 3,229 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @burfle23 said:

    @IkesT said:
    "The current offer is for the NGC-certified superb gemstones." :D

    Did anyone record the seller's name?

    I'm sorry - I did not.

  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Found the genuine coin sold by Heritage in 2016:

  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Reverse image:

  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 24, 2022 1:56PM

    @FlyingAl said:
    It looks like a genuine 63 in a fake 67 holder to these eyes.

    Bar code of the listed example on top; genuine example on the bottom:

    Bar code isn't even close...

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,317 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @burfle23

    I don't think my comment was quite clear - I think the coin is a genuine example of a 1921 Morgan that grades roughly 63, the holder is a counterfeit NGC example and reports a false grade of 67. Hope this clears up the confusion? :smile:

    Coin Photographer.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,647 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FlyingAl said:
    @burfle23

    I don't think my comment was quite clear - I think the coin is a genuine example of a 1921 Morgan that grades roughly 63, the holder is a counterfeit NGC example and reports a false grade of 67. Hope this clears up the confusion? :smile:

    I also think that the eBay coin looks like a lower grade, genuine example and therefore that the thread title is inaccurate.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 24, 2022 2:09PM

    @FlyingAl said:
    @burfle23

    I don't think my comment was quite clear - I think the coin is a genuine example of a 1921 Morgan that grades roughly 63, the holder is a counterfeit NGC example and reports a false grade of 67. Hope this clears up the confusion? :smile:

    I totally agreed with your comment @FlyingAl ; holder is not nearly as convincing as some of the recent PCGS holders with lower grade genuine coins in them we have seen recently.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file