Home Sports Talk

Donnie Baseball documentary

doubledragondoubledragon Posts: 23,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

MLB Network is going to air a documentary on Donnie Baseball tonight in case anyone would like to watch it, I love sports documentaries so I thought I would let everyone know.

‘Donnie Baseball’ documentary perfectly captures Don Mattingly

Don Mattingly’s baseball life is ably chronicled in the ‘Donnie Baseball’ documentary, which airs on MLB Network on Sunday at 4:30 p.m. PT.

Mattingly’s playing career was cut short by back injuries, but his peak, though short, left an indelible mark on the sport. He won a batting title in his first full season, won American League MVP the next year, then led the league in slugging percentage and OPS the season after that.

From 1984-89, Mattingly led the majors in doubles (257), total bases (1,978), slugging percentage (.530), and RBI (684), was third in hits (1,219) and batting average (.327), and ranked seventh in bWAR (33.0) and OPS+ (147).

“He’s as good a player as I’ve ever seen in my career,” said pitcher Ron Guidry, Mattingly’s teammate for seven seasons in New York.

Mattingly more than earned the nickname “Donnie Baseball,” which lends its name to the documentary. But despite his superstar status, Mattingly remains the most grounded, down-to-earth baseball person I’ve ever covered.

There’s a point in the documentary when Mattingly said, “I wanted George Brett to think I was a good player.” The longtime Royals start third baseman and future Hall of Famer Brett responds by saying, “If I’m going to be in a foxhole, who do I want with me? Playing against Don Mattingly, he was the guy. In my mind, he’s a Hall of Famer.”

Mattingly after 1989 played six more seasons, but diminished by back troubles was a more ordinary but still productive player, hitting .286/.345/.405 with a 105 OPS+ in those years, averaging 28 doubles and 10 home runs per season but only 128 games played.

He wasn’t voted to the Hall of Fame. Despite lasting on the ballot for his full 15 years, Mattingly never topped the 28.2-percent support from the BBWAA he got in 2001, his first year on the ballot. But Mattingly, who was interviewed extensively for this documentary — in many ways, telling his own story (though there is a narrator) — seems at peace with it.

Mattingly coached under Joe Torre with the Yankees, then followed Torre to Los Angeles as hitting coach with the Dodgers in 2008. Three years later, Mattingly succeeded Torre as Dodgers manager, a position he held through 2015.

Mattingly was literally nicknamed “Donnie Baseball” as a player, but as a manager, you wouldn’t know it. The man has no pretense, and that’s captured perfectly in the documentary.

“He gives you that impression that he’s here to work. He rolls his sleeves up, he doesn’t want to shortchange anything,” said Torre. “It’s blue collar. He never lost the midwest.”

Mattingly was just 34 when he retired as a player, and part of the reason was to spend more time with his kids, who were young at the time. In the documentary, Mattingly teared up as he explained how his parents were always there for him growing up. They weren’t overly effusive in their praise of Mattingly, but instilled a work ethic and supported him, going to nearly every one of his prep games.

“They were there, and I had zero fear of screwing up, because I never got criticized,” Mattingly said. “That lack of fear of screwing up allows you to just grow, and get better. Take chances, not be afraid to make a mistake. If it doesn’t work, learn from it and move on.”

Hard work is central to Mattingly’s ethos. He wasn’t flashy, but still commanded respect.

Buck Showalter, who managed Mattingly’s final four seasons, summed him up perfectly: “Donnie’s substance was his style.”

Comments

  • doubledragondoubledragon Posts: 23,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Of course, I love this image of Don Mattingly, one of my favorites of all time.

  • doubledragondoubledragon Posts: 23,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm sorry, but I'm getting a bit emotional, I have a soft spot for Donnie Baseball. There's two people in my life you don't talk bad about, my mother and Donnie Baseball.

  • mrhighgrademrhighgrade Posts: 56 ✭✭✭

    I look forward to watching this documentary.

  • 1948_Swell_Robinson1948_Swell_Robinson Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They are making a push to get Mattingly into the Hall. Hal Steinbrenner even gave credit to Mattingly for the Jeter Yankee dynstasy when he said that Mattingly suggested to him in the early 90's that they should stop trading away their prospects for win now players because that strategy had failed them.

  • 1948_Swell_Robinson1948_Swell_Robinson Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭✭✭

    From 1984-1987 which mania was higher, Mattingly or Gooden? To think back how they were both the face of the game and absolutely brought on the rookie card craze more than any other player....and neither ended up in the Hall of Fame.

    In that vein, also considering Mattingly losing effectiveness from his back injury, and his contributions as a teammate....

    I would put Mattingly in just for stepping in on behalf of a young Bernie Williams who was struggling to find his ground and whom was being hazed by douches in the clubhouse, and Mattingly put a stop to it.

  • 1948_Swell_Robinson1948_Swell_Robinson Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Mattingly was not as bad at the end as people make it out to be. He did lose power, but don't forget that they missed a lot of games due to strike in 1994-95 so his counting numbers look worse than they really are.

    He had a 103 OPS+ combined in 1994/95, which makes him slightly above league average hitter.

    However, if people are going to keep Bonds and company out of the Hall of Fame for artificially inflating their numbers due to PED, then in that same vein, that 103 OPS+ from Mattingly in those years has a higher value than it shows.

    .295/.367/.412 isn't too bad in 94/95. It looks worse when compared to the PED users.

  • TabeTabe Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1948_Swell_Robinson said:

    He had a 103 OPS+ combined in 1994/95, which makes him slightly above league average hitter.

    That's 103 OPS+ for a 1B though. 103 OPS+ at 1B is pretty terrible. For example, in 1994, only 2 or 3 teams had a 1B with an OPS+ below 103 - and all of them were splitting duties. The reality is that 6 homers and a .411 slugging (or 7 and .413) for a 1B is awful.

Sign In or Register to comment.