Even if those are mint created adjustment marks, I wouldn't buy that coin unless it was sharply discounted. They make this coin really ugly.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
@PerryHall said:
Even if those are mint created adjustment marks, I wouldn't buy that coin unless it was sharply discounted. They make this coin really ugly.
Adjustment marks are one of those things that some people ignore and others just can't.
@Aercus said:
Forgive me for my lack of expertise on this series, but don't those denticles look odd? Is this a genuine piece?
More crude production. Doesn't look obviously fake to me.
Look at five o'clock on the reverse. Some of the denticles are tear shaped. That's a big red flag in any other series I've seen. But like I said, not an expert on this one. My knowledge is limited any earlier than draped bust.
Obverse adjustment marks, O-108a/T-17, small rim cud, old clean VF25 details. Appears genuine but need in hand inspection to confirm. Here is my example, same DM PCGS F15:
Robert Scot: Engraving Liberty - biography of US Mint's first chief engraver
@Nysoto said:
Obverse adjustment marks, O-108a/T-17, small rim cud, old clean VF25 details. Appears genuine but need in hand inspection to confirm. Here is my example, same DM PCGS F15:
Thanks. I didn't realize this marriage had such unusual denticles.
Comments
On the obverse, yes. On the reverse, no.
Adjustment marks on a solid VF
The way the coin is lit makes it look possibly wiped, but it also could be a very decent, original coin 🙂
Agree but that coin looks severely processed so to speak. Hopefully it's the pictures.
Even if those are mint created adjustment marks, I wouldn't buy that coin unless it was sharply discounted. They make this coin really ugly.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
The coin looks to have heavy adjustment marks, as well as obviously cleaned surfaces and some distracting obverse scratches.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Not a coin that I would want.
Forgive me for my lack of expertise on this series, but don't those denticles look odd? Is this a genuine piece?
Aercus Numismatics - Certified coins for sale
More crude production. Doesn't look obviously fake to me.
Adjustment marks are one of those things that some people ignore and others just can't.
I think it's genuine, but if I'm spending several thousand dollars on a coin, it will likely not be this coin...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Look at five o'clock on the reverse. Some of the denticles are tear shaped. That's a big red flag in any other series I've seen. But like I said, not an expert on this one. My knowledge is limited any earlier than draped bust.
Aercus Numismatics - Certified coins for sale
Obverse adjustment marks, O-108a/T-17, small rim cud, old clean VF25 details. Appears genuine but need in hand inspection to confirm. Here is my example, same DM PCGS F15:
Thanks. I didn't realize this marriage had such unusual denticles.
Aercus Numismatics - Certified coins for sale