Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1977 topps basketball...thoughts from the board

Should PSA recognize the back differences, one gray and one green, much like the 1952, 1954, 1956, 1959, 1981 opc baseball backs? 1979 football isn't recognized either, yellow vs gray?

Work hard and you will succeed!!

Comments

  • bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 8, 2021 1:45PM

    I once read that it was a due to a manufacturing difference in paper (due to availability/cost?). Since it was not an intentional design difference, I doubt that PSA will recognize it. Still, I like the brighter backs much better on the 77 Basketball cards.

  • empigtvempigtv Posts: 58 ✭✭

    100%. The grey backs are really tough in high grade and criminally undervalued in my humble opinion. My anecdotal evidence (from looking for grey backs on eBay for the past several years) suggests the green are easily 10x more plentiful.

  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bobbybakeriv said:
    I once read that it was a due to a manufacturing difference in paper (due to availability/cost?). Since it was not an intentional design difference, I doubt that PSA will recognize it. Still, I like the brighter backs much better on the 77 Basketball cards.

    no matter, the card is definitely different. they remade fleer ripken's and johnson's and the prices are different.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • miwlvrnmiwlvrn Posts: 4,264 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm still waiting for the 1973 OPC Hockey Gray (Grey) vs. White Back distinction to be recognized by PSA. Another variation they need to specify is the Orange border vs. Yellow border for 1946 Montiel

  • baz518baz518 Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭✭

    I'm glad PSA draws a line somewhere... cardstock variations are very common and I'm glad they won't distinguish them.

  • Nathaniel1960Nathaniel1960 Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1968 Topps Football too.

    Kiss me once, shame on you.
    Kiss me twice.....let's party.
  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @baz518 said:
    I'm glad PSA draws a line somewhere... cardstock variations are very common and I'm glad they won't distinguish them.

    I agree, so why do they on just some items? The newer cards, just call them prizm's or refractors to designate the differences. Same card pic, but not the same price.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • ldfergldferg Posts: 6,742 ✭✭✭

    Yes, they should recognize them separately.



    Thanks,

    David (LD_Ferg)



    1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
  • baz518baz518 Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭✭

    @olb31 said:

    @baz518 said:
    I'm glad PSA draws a line somewhere... cardstock variations are very common and I'm glad they won't distinguish them.

    I agree, so why do they on just some items? The newer cards, just call them prizm's or refractors to designate the differences. Same card pic, but not the same price.

    To me the key is intent. If the variation is from procuring different raw materials for the end product, imo it's not worth distinguishing the difference. Paper, ink, printing plates, rollers, etc. can all make the same card look different. I get one might be rarer or more condition sensitive, but that should be reflected in price/value... not necessarily on the flip.

  • ArtVandelayArtVandelay Posts: 699 ✭✭✭✭

    1977 Basketball is one of my favorite sets. One of my earliest memories as a real young kid was buying a box of these and seeing the bright green backs. It's definitely much more difficult to find the grey backs. However, the green backs look so much better!

  • bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 10, 2021 6:19AM

    @ArtVandelay said:
    1977 Basketball is one of my favorite sets. One of my earliest memories as a real young kid was buying a box of these and seeing the bright green backs. It's definitely much more difficult to find the grey backs. However, the green backs look so much better!

    I like the bright green backs way better too. I have a sub in right now that includes 21 1977 basketball including multiple Ervings, Jabbars, and Maravichs. I don't expect to see them anytime soon though as they were received in March and entered in May. Still in R&D needless to say. :| It's my last sub in the hopper at this point and Lord only knows when things will open back up. Good luck with your collection!

  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ArtVandelay said:
    1977 Basketball is one of my favorite sets. One of my earliest memories as a real young kid was buying a box of these and seeing the bright green backs. It's definitely much more difficult to find the grey backs. However, the green backs look so much better!

    Agreed, The bright green is much more desireable to look at.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Baz you are probably correct. But why distinguish the baseball ones? Especially if it's a main set and their are differences either it matters or it doesn't. If they recognize several baseball sets (and their are probably more than I listed) then I think you should list the others. Right now basketball cards are pretty darn hot. A variation, if recognized, could make a huge price difference in the cards.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • AhmanfanAhmanfan Posts: 4,389 ✭✭✭✭

    Nor sure answer to your question but 70s basketball is way underpriced.

    Collecting
    HOF SIGNED FOOTBALL RCS
  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Ahmanfan said:
    Nor sure answer to your question but 70s basketball is way underpriced.

    They are really hard to get your hand on nice ones. print supply maybe 25% of baseball.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
Sign In or Register to comment.