1967 Roosevelt dime no mint mark
AlWhite
Posts: 1 ✭
in Q & A Forum
I found this Roosevelt 1967 done with no mint mark it also has very thin clashing on the edge at Roosevelt's head. The cladding is the reason I noticed it looked as if the coin was separating. There are several other errors on the coin like the 6 appears larger than the other numbers the in and we are almost indistinguishable along with other things. Any help would be much appreciated
0
Comments
@AlWhite Protocol round these parts is provide a close in focus image of both sides of a coin to solicit comments. Good luck. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
No 1967 dimes have a mintmark.
No mint mark is normal
Post pics
https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/category/half-dimes/roosevelt-dime/type-2-clad/1639
As you can see on PCGS’ CoinFacts page, there are no mint marks for 1965, 1966 and 1967 dimes
Sounds like a damaged common coin but without photos, who knows?
If you can post a nice photo of the obverse and the reverse we all can see what your referring too. No mint mark is the norm for this dime.
USN & USAF retired 1971-1993
Successful Transactions with more than 100 Members