Copper-Nickel vs. Cupronickel
JesseKraft
Posts: 414 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Q & A Forum
Which do you prefer?
Jesse C. Kraft, Ph.D.
Resolute Americana Curator of American Numismatics
American Numismatic Society
New York City
Member of the American Numismatic Association (ANA), British Numismatic Society (BNS), New York Numismatic Club (NYNC), Early American Copper (EAC), the Colonial Coin Collectors Club (C4), U.S. Mexican Numismatic Association (USMNA), Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC), Token and Medal Society (TAMS), and life member of the Atlantic County Numismatic Society (ACNS).
Become a member of the American Numismatic Society!
Copper-Nickel vs. Cupronickel
This is a public poll: others will see what you voted for.
0
Comments
I prefer to write 75Cu25Ni to designate the alloy but that doesn't appear to be used much in numismatics
I like Oldhoopster's way of describing the alloy more precisely, but otherwise why not make it short so I like to use 'Cu-Ni' which is shorter to write.
This could actually be a can of worms.
CN Indian Head/FE cents.
Our "nickel" is actually a CN alloy.
Most coins we call copper nickel are "clad", layers of copper and CN alloy.
I have been using Cu-Ni for a long time. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
Hadn't really thought about it but CN works for me.
USN & USAF retired 1971-1993
Successful Transactions with more than 100 Members
Just clad for me - as long as it gets the "NOT SILVER" message across I'm good with it!
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"