Home U.S. Coin Forum

Why are Voce Populis listed in the Red Book?

MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,394 ✭✭✭✭✭

Any good reason besides “tradition”?

Seems ridiculous to me.

Andy Lustig

Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.

Comments

  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Way back in the early '60's I got my first Red Book. I have wondered about that for almost 60 years.
    Maybe someone will know.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,725 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Why do you feel that it shouldn't be in the Red Book?

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    iirc, this country had a lot of diversity even hundreds of years ago and one of the races i recall reading about were irishmen and this is an iris related coin i think so they probably circulated over here and since that section of the redbook has been exceedingly expanded, i presume to acknowledge and inform us of our rich and diverse ancestry.

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @sellitstore said:
    even though it appears that these coins weren't made for or shipped to America in any quantity. The redbook is >in error and these should not be included.

    .
    does the context of "in any quantity" mean; a. not any at all or b. not very many?

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,394 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:

    @sellitstore said:
    even though it appears that these coins weren't made for or shipped to America in any quantity. The redbook is >in error and these should not be included.

    .
    does the context of "in any quantity" mean; a. not any at all or b. not very many?

    As far as I'm concerned, the RB should only include colonial era coins that played a meaningful part in the story of American coinage. I don't think there were enough Voce Populis used here for the coins to meet that standard.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • oldabeintxoldabeintx Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There are others that are rather inappropriate inclusions in the Redbook as "colonials", and some IMO that should be included (admittedly I haven't looked in a while). Former: e.g. Mott tokens, 19th century Washington pieces, Latter: End of Pain tokens (arguably). My colonial type set is more selective for the most part, eschewing a number of traditional items. And I include many more foreign coins that actually circulated here. No VP included.

  • sellitstoresellitstore Posts: 3,053 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:

    @sellitstore said:
    even though it appears that these coins weren't made for or shipped to America in any quantity. The redbook is >in error and these should not be included.

    .
    does the context of "in any quantity" mean; a. not any at all or b. not very many?

    b.) Not very many. The article that I cite above mentions two or three examples found in the ground by metal detectors. This number is consistent with U.S. finds of European coppers NOT imported to the colonies for use here.

    Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
  • NicNic Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MrEureka said:

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:

    @sellitstore said:
    even though it appears that these coins weren't made for or shipped to America in any quantity. The redbook is >in error and these should not be included.

    .
    does the context of "in any quantity" mean; a. not any at all or b. not very many?

    As far as I'm concerned, the RB should only include colonial era coins that played a meaningful part in the story of American coinage. I don't think there were enough Voce Populis used here for the coins to meet that standard.

    I agree. And the "Continental Dollars" the same.
    The CD are a token not a coin, made abroad and never circulated, no meaningful part in the story of early American coinage, etc.
    At least a VP is a coin.

  • coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @oldabeintx said:
    There are others that are rather inappropriate inclusions in the Redbook as "colonials", and some IMO that should be included (admittedly I haven't looked in a while). Former: e.g. Mott tokens, 19th century Washington pieces, Latter: End of Pain tokens (arguably). My colonial type set is more selective for the most part, eschewing a number of traditional items. And I include many more foreign coins that actually circulated here. No VP included.

    .
    .
    Granted I have not bought or looked at a red book in many years. Did I understand you
    right that they include End of Pain tokens ?

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,042 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:
    iirc, this country had a lot of diversity even hundreds of years ago and one of the races i recall reading about were irishmen and this is an iris related coin i think so they probably circulated over here and since that section of the redbook has been exceedingly expanded, i presume to acknowledge and inform us of our rich and diverse ancestry.

    You can take off your mask now.

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    At this point, it is tradition. Personally, I'm fine with that.

    There are a myriad of foreign coins that circulated here. I'm not sure there needs to be a guideline for what any collector chooses to include. I'm also not sure there needs to be a strict guideline for what a reference chooses to include. Those guidelines (IMHO) could also be loosest for British/British colonial pieces since we were, of course, ourselves a colony.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Nic said:

    @MrEureka said:

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:

    @sellitstore said:
    even though it appears that these coins weren't made for or shipped to America in any quantity. The redbook is >in error and these should not be included.

    .
    does the context of "in any quantity" mean; a. not any at all or b. not very many?

    As far as I'm concerned, the RB should only include colonial era coins that played a meaningful part in the story of American coinage. I don't think there were enough Voce Populis used here for the coins to meet that standard.

    I agree. And the "Continental Dollars" the same.
    The CD are a token not a coin, made abroad and never circulated, no meaningful part in the story of early American coinage, etc.
    At least a VP is a coin.

    Probably true, but that would be a controversial exclusion even if accurate.

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,394 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 14, 2021 2:39PM

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Nic said:

    @MrEureka said:

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:

    @sellitstore said:
    even though it appears that these coins weren't made for or shipped to America in any quantity. The redbook is >in error and these should not be included.

    .
    does the context of "in any quantity" mean; a. not any at all or b. not very many?

    As far as I'm concerned, the RB should only include colonial era coins that played a meaningful part in the story of American coinage. I don't think there were enough Voce Populis used here for the coins to meet that standard.

    I agree. And the "Continental Dollars" the same.
    The CD are a token not a coin, made abroad and never circulated, no meaningful part in the story of early American coinage, etc.
    At least a VP is a coin.

    Probably true, but that would be a controversial exclusion even if accurate.

    I wouldn't exclude the Continental Dollars or other traditionally accepted colonial era tokens and medals of clear American interest. No problem with a New York Theatre or Kentucky token, for example, as long as they're categorized appropriately. But the Voce Populis seem like a mistake that should be corrected.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • MidLifeCrisisMidLifeCrisis Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A few Voce coppers have been dug up in areas known to have been settled by the Confederation period of Colonial-era America, including one example that was unearthed in upper State New York and another that was uncovered on a plantation in Port Deposit, Maryland.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file