1982P small date Zinic 1-DR-001
User1
Posts: 160 ✭
Ok,
I need some help before I post the full reverse..
The issue's are: I'm new, I have no clue how to properly run a scope, and I get alittle bit of a "you can go jump off a bridge attitude" when ppl think im bonkers and make up post..
I have been removed from 4 groups bc my pictures don't show what I see..
I tell them and they refuse to listen or help me..
So it gets me the boot lol
I found this coin last night amongst 1 other sweet one..
The reason I'm only post where this penny has been clashed is bc thats what makes this variety unique.. plus I suck at getting all the die marks to show properly..
Light and angles make a huge difference when locating them.. which I also suck at..
So before post full penny abf doing it a huge injustice I could really use some advice..
Comments
I doubt you were booted from four groups just because your pictures don’t show what you see or because people refuse to listen or help you.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Highly unlikely.
That is one rare variety. It is also a very obvious variety. You will not need the obverse diagnostics to identify.
Good luck
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
Welcome to the forum!
A full reverse photo is the best place to start if you think you have a DDR.
Wrong variety. Whoops
Young Numismatist/collector
75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
I see no comparable die markers between the two.
This is the 1983 DDR. He was asking about the 1982 DDR. But still, his coin is not that variety.
Whoops. My bad.
Young Numismatist/collector
75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
Updated few more pics..
I'm not kidding that's it is the one..
I also know that before I post full reverse I need to know what I'm doing bc if you don't get the same lighting and angle the. It doesn't look right
I still see no comparable die markers between the two
1982P DDR is Different from 1983 DDR markkelly
The O doesn't look like that
The 2 doesn't look like a 3 either.
That was my bad. Here's the one your looking for
http://www.varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/1982PDDR001.htm
Young Numismatist/collector
75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
Ok,
Not sure why you compared two completely different dates and styles of DDRs?
who is "you" ?
person who posted the 1983 has deleted it
the pictures posted by User1 have no comparable die markers
Ms Morris..
I said I sucked and getting the markers..
I'm not kidding..
My post is about getting the help so I can post the full reverse as it should be..
To not to any injustice but like also ppl are quick to deny instead if just helping
I mean for real why is that so hard for ppl to do?
there is no need.
the die markers are not there.
also, we don't have the scope with us or us with you to show you how to use it.
The obverse photos appear to be PMD but that doesn't matter.
If you are asking about a DDR there is no need to keep posting obverse photos.
The variety is easy to identify from a clear reverse full coin photo.
"I have been removed from 4 groups"
Don't keep doing the same thing expecting a different result.
If you are posting questions about one side of a coin but will only show the other side it may appear you are just playing games or are a troll.
Yes I have been removed bc no one will help me!!
Like for real I ask and they just don't help..
Then we both get aggravated at each other then I get a boot
Btw.. all pics above was from my cell phone with a lens.. not a microscope which helps with markers alot more
If you are really looking for help and not just playing games....... post a full reverse photo.
We are trying to help you but you are not helping us.
you've been given the link to the exact answer you seek. you posting pictures is not a part of the equation. look at your coin, look at the pics on that site. voila!
What die marks do you wanna see?
I will take the time to scope them.. probably gonna suck but I will do it..
Also until I know how to properly scope and get the image across to the viewer I'm not gonna post reverse..
This is the same fox hole I have been down with the other groups..
You guys deny it.. I try to prove it but wind up being incapable bc of my inability to scope and collect the right images..
A scope will not be needed for a full reverse picture. Just snap a focused pic in a well lit area.
Young Numismatist/collector
75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
"What die marks do you wanna see?"
None
"I'm not gonna post reverse.."
So you are playing games with people trying to help you.
The link to pics of the 1982 DDR show clear doubling that you would clearly capture in photos if you were to post them.
All I can conclude is that your coin is not the DDR.
The obverse marks shown on VV are die polishing lines which are not present on the subject coin
If you believe in it, why not send it to someone like John Wexler and let him validate you?
http://www.varietyvista.com/Attribution Services.htm
Not posting the reverse and clinging to the obverse “markers” isn’t going to go solve anything. Unless that’s your intention.
TurtleCat Gold Dollars
Since you are capable of posting close up photos, post photos of “E Pluribus Unum”
You are playing games.
Your photos are more than good enough to show the doubling if it is there. You are wasting our time trying to show microscopic die markers instead of the actual doubling which would be clear to the naked eye.
Sorry phone died..
I will upadate with a non maginfied reverse pic shortly..
I did my homework on this DDR before posting amd im not messing with yall..
Im beimg 100% honest about my issue with scoping..
Not sure if it is the equipmet, me or both
Ms morris they are there i saw them .. its all about angle and light..
I will aslo update pic with the markers requested.
Also ive noticed die polish marks can be miss leading depending on the stage of the die.
You are obsessed with "scoping" a DDR that would have been clear in any pictures of the quality you have already posted.
Something tells me your coin is not a DDR but that you will try to insist that it is one.
Go here BEFORE you post this garbage on the boards. Does it look like this? No? Then it ain't what you think it is.
http://www.varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/1982PDDR001.htm
And by the way, it has to match exactly.
Ok..
Here is your markers for WE GOD as requested...
So I did teach my self something..
I ran a screen recorder and then slowly went thru it bc I think my problem is partially equippment..
Like when I get the shot I want, the scope moves bc of cheap stand thus messing it completely up..
I really do think it's a mix of cheap equipment, and being new..
You can see the upper and lower marks..
I can provide all marks seen on copper coins but will be in different shots bc of what I said above..
Getting snap of reverse now..
Another reference for marks under TR
"As requested" by whom? No one asked for more pictures of the obverse.
But you knew that.
See,
This is my issue..
I can see the marks but I can't capture them properly..
Same with the doubling..
I don't know what scope is besy? bc obviously this $10 amazon scope is cutting it..
Why are you still posting photos of the obverse?
Unfortunately operation of your own equipment is not really something that we can help you with, it takes your own practice and experimentation to get it right... and yes maybe something that is of higher quality, which is going to cost more than $10.
Yes the DDR shows in my scope but as I stated in my post, I didn't want my inability to properly scope to do this variety any injustice
Happy now??
Still think im jacking around?