Kennedy weights are posted
tompkins
Posts: 413
Proof
Basic Set, CS
with Varieties, CS
Any thoughts? My only comments/questions (all regarding the proof weighting) are:
1. Should there be higher bonus for DCAM designation for accent hair coins?
2. Should the 65 SMS have a higher weight and/or higher DCAM bonus?
3. And I'm not sure I agree with all the 92 and later silvers having a weight of 2. If they had a weight of 1-1/4 (that is, weight everything at 4, and make the silvers 5) Perhaps some of the earlier ones deserve a 2, but the recent ones are easy to come by in higher grades.
4. And, finally, my complaint about all of the modern proof weighting, that there should be a penalty for non-DCAM post 1978 coins (and they should show in the pop report). I know DCAM is the norm, but there are non-DCAM coins out there (especially 2002 Jefferson nickels).
Pete
Basic Set, CS
with Varieties, CS
Any thoughts? My only comments/questions (all regarding the proof weighting) are:
1. Should there be higher bonus for DCAM designation for accent hair coins?
2. Should the 65 SMS have a higher weight and/or higher DCAM bonus?
3. And I'm not sure I agree with all the 92 and later silvers having a weight of 2. If they had a weight of 1-1/4 (that is, weight everything at 4, and make the silvers 5) Perhaps some of the earlier ones deserve a 2, but the recent ones are easy to come by in higher grades.
4. And, finally, my complaint about all of the modern proof weighting, that there should be a penalty for non-DCAM post 1978 coins (and they should show in the pop report). I know DCAM is the norm, but there are non-DCAM coins out there (especially 2002 Jefferson nickels).
Pete
0
Comments
Lots of other thoughts here.
Russ, NCNE
Pete