Home› U.S. Coin Forum

PCGS TrueView - Guess The Grades - 4 Coins - RESULTS POSTED

jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited January 6, 2021 6:08AM in U.S. Coin Forum

#1

#2

#3

#4

Comments

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,610 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I grade them Genuine common dates that were held in cheap marking holders worth melt. That said I could see them in AU58-62 holders as NT full knowing the bar for what constitutes attract toning on the series is very low.

    1.Au58 Rub on cheek / strike limited (rev look baked/AT to me)
    2.Ms62 hits on face
    3.Ms62
    4.Ms62 Darker in hand and low luster

    11.5$ Southern Dollars, The little “Big Easy” set

  • OriginalDanOriginalDan Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Crypto said:
    I grade them Genuine common dates that were held in cheap marking holders worth melt. That said I could see them in AU58-62 holders as NT full knowing the bar for what constitutes attract toning on the series is very low.

    1.Au58 Rub on cheek / strike limited (rev look baked/AT to me)
    2.Ms62 hits on face
    3.Ms62
    4.Ms62 Darker in hand and low luster

    You forgot to have your coffee before reading the forum this morning. Oh wait, that's right you're a tea drinker >:)

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,447 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1 55
    2 62
    3 64
    4 64

    Collector, occasional seller

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,732 ✭✭✭✭✭

    5
    3
    4
    5

    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Crypto said:
    I grade them Genuine common dates that were held in cheap marking holders worth melt. That said I could see them in AU58-62 holders as NT full knowing the bar for what constitutes attract toning on the series is very low.

    1.Au58 Rub on cheek / strike limited (rev look baked/AT to me)
    2.Ms62 hits on face
    3.Ms62
    4.Ms62 Darker in hand and low luster

    That's a cute response. They are indeed "common dates", and yes, Peace Dollars rarely tone as well as Morgans and other series. However, my original post did not solicit your thoughts on the toning or the rarity of date. But thanks for your comments.

  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭✭✭

    And obviously i left the pcgs numbers on the images, so try not to cheat, lol.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,479 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jerseycat101 said:
    And obviously i left the pcgs numbers on the images, so try not to cheat, lol.

    Too late, no guess.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Any chance you could link to larger photos so we can guess without seeing the grades?

  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cameonut2011 said:
    Any chance you could link to larger photos so we can guess without seeing the grades?

    The URL for a max resolution TV of cert # XXXXXXXX is:

    https://images.pcgs.com/TrueView/XXXXXXXX_max.jpg

    My Roosevelt Dime Registry Set
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,256 ✭✭✭✭✭

    55
    63
    64
    65

    “I may not believe in myself but I believe in what I’m doing” ~Jimmy Page~

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    55
    58 (possibly net graded to 55 for the scratch on the cheek - I don't think it is fatal based on other straight graded coins I've seen)
    58
    64

  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,953 ✭✭✭✭✭

    45
    62
    63
    63

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    55
    64
    64
    65
    Great coins! B)

  • coinhackcoinhack Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭✭

    Consecutive serial numbers, no less. If they all straight graded, that was a very nice batch.

    55 64 65 64

  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1. AU-55
    2. UNC Details - Scratched
    3. UNC Details - Cleaned
    4. MS-64

    Quite disappointed by the sub. There is a small scratch on coin #2 on the cheek, never imagined it would amount to a bodybag. I am unable to find cleaning on #3, but perhaps something happened when the tape was removed from the reverse.

    Interesting planchet defect/lamination on coin #3 on the reverse near "PEACE".

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,610 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jerseycat101 said:
    1. AU-55
    2. UNC Details - Scratched
    3. UNC Details - Cleaned
    4. MS-64

    Quite disappointed by the sub. There is a small scratch on coin #2 on the cheek, never imagined it would amount to a bodybag. I am unable to find cleaning on #3, but perhaps something happened when the tape was removed from the reverse.

    Interesting planchet defect/lamination on coin #3 on the reverse near "PEACE".

    Cute set of grades

    11.5$ Southern Dollars, The little “Big Easy” set

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,447 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jerseycat101 said:
    1. AU-55
    2. UNC Details - Scratched
    3. UNC Details - Cleaned
    4. MS-64

    Quite disappointed by the sub. There is a small scratch on coin #2 on the cheek, never imagined it would amount to a bodybag. I am unable to find cleaning on #3, but perhaps something happened when the tape was removed from the reverse.

    Interesting planchet defect/lamination on coin #3 on the reverse near "PEACE".

    Huh.. I am also surprised that small scratch on #2 sent it home in a details holder. Not sure about #3, must be something somewhere.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Crypto said:

    @jerseycat101 said:
    1. AU-55
    2. UNC Details - Scratched
    3. UNC Details - Cleaned
    4. MS-64

    Quite disappointed by the sub. There is a small scratch on coin #2 on the cheek, never imagined it would amount to a bodybag. I am unable to find cleaning on #3, but perhaps something happened when the tape was removed from the reverse.

    Interesting planchet defect/lamination on coin #3 on the reverse near "PEACE".

    Cute set of grades

    We get it. You presumably have a lot of money and can buy big coins. I am middle-class, so I enjoy my "cute" coins. Sorry they don't pass your muster.

  • ike126ike126 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Crypto said:

    @jerseycat101 said:
    1. AU-55
    2. UNC Details - Scratched
    3. UNC Details - Cleaned
    4. MS-64

    Quite disappointed by the sub. There is a small scratch on coin #2 on the cheek, never imagined it would amount to a bodybag. I am unable to find cleaning on #3, but perhaps something happened when the tape was removed from the reverse.

    Interesting planchet defect/lamination on coin #3 on the reverse near "PEACE".

    Cute set of grades

    That's something new nice. Do you open up your submission box and say i got some pretty grades this time? LOL

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...