Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

20 Kopek, 1914, Proof?

Any diagnostics for proof Kopeks?




Comments

  • Not a PF. These late Nicholas II issues should be obvious, like a US proof Barber quarter.

  • Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 9,111 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Both fields exhibit considerable polish lines. @IVB may have some insight on this. Ivan, what say you? Peace Roy

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW

  • IVBIVB Posts: 248 ✭✭✭

    I also believe that this is not a Proof. There should be a matte relief.

  • bombtech25bombtech25 Posts: 209 ✭✭✭

    Thank you gentlemen for the replies.

Sign In or Register to comment.