Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

How do you decide what to grade?

This has come up before but curious for new / different POVs.

Going over a few thousand cards from rips - 70’s and 80’s and come across the random 81 Dick Drago, Bobby Brown, Jim Spencer type cards. After review and review under loupe you get comfortable the card would grade a 9, but total crap shoot whether it’s a 10......and even if it is, is it worth it? I don’t do registry, but curious what others do since card savers protect them without grading. I’d love to grade the stack but it’s expensive and will there ever be a sell-able market for an 81 T PSA Bobby Brown? Lol.

Comments

  • daltexdaltex Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @balco758 said:
    This has come up before but curious for new / different POVs.

    Going over a few thousand cards from rips - 70’s and 80’s and come across the random 81 Dick Drago, Bobby Brown, Jim Spencer type cards. After review and review under loupe you get comfortable the card would grade a 9, but total crap shoot whether it’s a 10......and even if it is, is it worth it? I don’t do registry, but curious what others do since card savers protect them without grading. I’d love to grade the stack but it’s expensive and will there ever be a sell-able market for an 81 T PSA Bobby Brown? Lol.

    Last 10 sold for $100.

  • In4apennyIn4apenny Posts: 298 ✭✭✭

    There is no accounting for taste or preferences, 1st rule of economics. Go with you gut, you never know who will find it right in his/hers wheelhouse. How did a 89 UD Griffey psa 1 go for big bucks?

  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 11,806 ✭✭✭✭✭

    9's from the 1970's should be worth grading I would think? Especially if well centered.

    You might want to look at how many people are collecting graded sets from each year and watch for low pop commons.

    I recently did a project with 1987 Topps. Bought a bunch of unopened and ripped it. Lots of garbage there. Also had a few thousand cards from collecting packs and the occasional box purchase.

    Even though there aren't many guys building the 87 set, I pulled some low pop commons that I thought had a chance at a 10 and all the star cards of course.

    With the other cards, I looked at what the star cards and rookies were selling for in a 10 and a 9 and decided to submit cards that were worth at least $20.00 or so in a 9. My thinking was I should get some 10's (I went over the cards multiple times and had a card buddy with a good eye look at them as well) a bunch of 9's and some lower.

    I am retired, so am doing it for fun. If I was more serious about it, I would probably have used a higher number than $20.00.

    Sent in 170 cards in June and am wondering when PSA will ever get them done. Cards are still in research and ID.

    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
  • balco758balco758 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks Joe- I’ve sort of been following this type of approach. I was using $50 as my floor given grading fees, postage, selling fees and my lack of patience on the it takes time to grade! I guess there is no rush so will just enjoy the journey.

  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 11,806 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Glad there is no rush, PSA has apparently stopped (at least temporarily) working on "bulk" subs.

    $50.00 is probably a better number to use as a "floor".

    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
  • blurryfaceblurryface Posts: 5,136 ✭✭✭✭✭

    considering i've been doing a bunch of box breaks and send off for consignment, if a psa 9 brings in $1 more the cost of grading and consignment fee, i'm sending it off. maximizes the box and worth the risk should it gem. besides, by the time i finally get it back, the 9/10 is worth more than at the time it was subbed.

    not really doing any personal subs at the moment. striking while the iron is hot on the ultra-modern market.

  • balco758balco758 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I should have added I am mostly reviewing 77 and 79 OPC and 81 T. Not exactly the highest in demand! Maybe 81 in time.

    I think it’s a nice looking set just not lots of value sans 10s.

Sign In or Register to comment.