@oldUScoins said:
Cool thanks guys. That was my guess as well but wanted some expert opinions.
That's a nice looking CBH.
Here's a tip for the ole' "attribution help post" ... tell us your thoughts so we can verify an attribution rather than determine the variety from scratch. IMO, it's numismatically rude to ask others to do attribution work if all you already have an idea of the attribution and you are really seeking confirmation.
Please don't my comment personal as you are not the first to ask for opinions on an Overton variety when you already had an idea of the die marriage.
Numismatist Ordinaire See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Comments
Perhaps an O117.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Right. O.117, small 0.
Lance.
Cool thanks guys. That was my guess as well but wanted some expert opinions.
That's a nice looking CBH.
Here's a tip for the ole' "attribution help post" ... tell us your thoughts so we can verify an attribution rather than determine the variety from scratch. IMO, it's numismatically rude to ask others to do attribution work if all you already have an idea of the attribution and you are really seeking confirmation.
Please don't my comment personal as you are not the first to ask for opinions on an Overton variety when you already had an idea of the die marriage.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Ok got it - thanks for the advice.