Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Wax or Cello Packs

mexpo75mexpo75 Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

I was wondering which is considered more valuable. Assuming all were graded the same (PSA 7), would a 1 or 5 cent wax pack or the PSA 7 cello pack be more valuable. Thanks.

PackManInNC

Comments

  • Options
    coinspackscoinspacks Posts: 971 ✭✭✭✭

    5 cent wax pack

  • Options
    rtimmerrtimmer Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭✭

    Cello pack

    Follow me at LinkedIn & Instagram: @ryanscard
    Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
    1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
  • Options
    grote15grote15 Posts: 29,532 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cellos in general, though there are a couple of exceptions like 1975 regular sized wax pack which is worth more than a cello pack.



    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Options
    mintonlyplsmintonlypls Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭✭✭

    From a pure aesthetic standpoint...wax packs hands down. The artwork on the wax wrapper is beautiful...

    mint_only_pls
  • Options
    coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I much prefer cellos.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • Options
    cgcmgrcgcmgr Posts: 116 ✭✭

    @JakeR2234 said:
    I have always found football cellos more aesthetically pleasing, and more valuable in similar grades.


    YMMV

    I love watching the progression of the price of the packs go up as the years go by. 25¢ to 30¢ to 39¢ etc.

    Love '83 Topps. Looking to put together a PSA 10 set.
  • Options
    blurryfaceblurryface Posts: 5,136 ✭✭✭✭✭

    generally speaking, cellos typically command more.

  • Options
    Webb63Webb63 Posts: 131 ✭✭✭

    From what I see, the Wax pack (in the equivalent grade) almost always sells for more than the cello pack....especially in a PSA 9. The exception is when the cello pack has a star or semi-star showing.

  • Options
    softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,271 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cellos all day and night. Wax too risky with gum eventually tearing the wrapper.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • Options
    handymanhandyman Posts: 5,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If the 1957 Cello had a logo like the 1970s Cellos I would say cello. But in this case I love the wax better for 57s.
    But if you were talking baseball. Those do have a logo version and I would way rather have a baseball cello with the logo vs wax.

Sign In or Register to comment.