Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

The most valuable rookie card in every Topps baseball set

Comments

  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good list but 2015 Update Lindor is more valuable than series 2 Kris Bryant is one I caught that was incorrect on first look

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Also if you are including traded then why not use the 86 Topps traded both the Jackson and Bonds higher than Guillen

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • daltexdaltex Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rexvos said:
    Also if you are including traded then why not use the 86 Topps traded both the Jackson and Bonds higher than Guillen

    They explained that. 1989 was the first year update sets were circulated widely enough to be considered RCs rather than XRCs.

  • GansetttimeGansetttime Posts: 232 ✭✭✭

    @dustinspeaks said:
    I bet update sets are printed at lower numbers now than they were in the 80s.

    Probably not on the 1981-84 years, but I'd agree with you otherwise.

  • GreenSneakersGreenSneakers Posts: 908 ✭✭✭✭

    Are there really a lot of folks that would take a 66 Shirley/Jackson over a Palmer?

    I get a 66 Master collector might but that’s got to be the minority.

  • countdouglascountdouglas Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @GreenSneakers said:
    Are there really a lot of folks that would take a 66 Shirley/Jackson over a Palmer?

    I get a 66 Master collector might but that’s got to be the minority.

    A couple years ago, that Shirley/Jackson card was the last one I needed to complete a raw set. I haven't priced it lately, but raw equivalents to a PSA 4/5 was going to cost $100+ every single time at auction. I have had 3 or 4 raw Palmer rookies in 6/7 equivalent that cost me like $30 each.

Sign In or Register to comment.