Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Recent sub now in hand. A couple of beauties

rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

I was not exactly thrilled with the grades on this one but most are fair. I did have a review already set to go for the Chipper I went ahead and threw the Sutter in with it. I am assuming I missed a surface wrinkle on Rickey




Looking for FB HOF Rookies

Comments

  • bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭

    Great cards! I would have thought the Henderson would have been higher too. It looks good in the scan.

  • hyperchipper09hyperchipper09 Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rexvos I really like the Molitor-Trammell. No smudge, centered nice. <3

  • slum22slum22 Posts: 2,594 ✭✭✭✭

    Great cards Mike. Good luck on the Chipper. It certainly seems worthy of a bump from what can be seen in the scans.

    Steve
  • jay0791jay0791 Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭✭

    Very nice cards
    Grades are great on most of them

    Collecting PSA... FB,BK,HK,and BB HOF RC sets
    1948-76 Topps FB Sets
    FB & BB HOF Player sets
    1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks guys.

    the Sutter is my favorite followed closely by the Trammell / Molitor. I was hoping for a break on one card (maybe a 10 on the Sutter, 9 on the Trammell or Rickey) and for much better on the Chipper. The disappointment came in not getting the 1 break. The 84 Fleer Clemens is a 9, my 10 looks noticeably better in my opinion. I thought the 85 Topps had a shot at 10. I sent the one o/c top to bottom Ripken in hopes of making the other one look better. Like I said the review was already set to go on the Chipper once I received the grades I figure why not throw the Sutter in and give it another go. The Rickey 8, the Clemens, Trammell / Molitor and Mattingly will remain in their respective cases. The others will be cracked and either resubmitted at a future dates or kept raw.

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • JBrulesJBrules Posts: 2,125 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That Sutter looks worthy of a review. Good luck and keep us posted on the results.

  • brad31brad31 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Love the Sutter and Molitor/Trammell.

  • craig44craig44 Posts: 11,264 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The Molly rookie looks great!!

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • handymanhandyman Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great cards. Belt seems to be tight at PSA. Man those look undergraded

  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @handyman said:
    Great cards. Belt seems to be tight at PSA. Man those look undergraded

    I agree but per usual I was more upset when I saw the grades than when I got the cards in hands. Do I think several are under graded yes, but I missed a little too. It just goes to show you that higher grade cards from 84 and back are all tough and deserve a premium.

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
Sign In or Register to comment.