Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Panini vs. Topps

Arenado_is_bestArenado_is_best Posts: 18

Which do you prefer?
Topps or Panini? and comment why please.
There are pros and cons to both. I personally like Panini for their unique card designs, and how they are creative and seem to have new products every year.
But, I also love Topps for their new design every year, and their high end products.

Comments

  • doubledragondoubledragon Posts: 23,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CdnOsfan said:
    If you are talking baseball, it doesn't matter how pretty a Panini design is, they ain't nothing without the MLB license and logos....

    Totally agree, no logos is just tacky looking.

  • craig44craig44 Posts: 11,238 ✭✭✭✭✭

    to me, panini is little more than a shiny broder card

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • This content has been removed.
  • firstbase23firstbase23 Posts: 457 ✭✭✭

    Topps

  • 1957Braves1957Braves Posts: 318 ✭✭✭

    If we’re sticking to baseball, agree that no logos is a deal breaker. I like the higher end offerings Topps has. They’ve gotten a little lazy in their flagship design. The past six years are essentially the same thing.

  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I remember the no logo Topps football of the late 1970's or whenever that was. So cheesy. And no thanks.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

Sign In or Register to comment.