1969 S Proof

Coinscratch

This looks like machine doubling because of the shelf like appearance except, I don't see it on all devices.
Is this an DD0-002? Thanks in advance...

Kliao

PCGS has no known examples of a 1969-S DDO proof.

ifthevamzarockin

Looks like machine doubling.

Hemispherical

There’s a couple listed at Variety Vista:

http://varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/DDO 1969-S.htm

Check the date for the spread and diagnostic marker on the reverse.

Kliao

@Hemispherical said:
There’s a couple listed at Variety Vista:

http://varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/DDO 1969-S.htm

Check the date for the spread and diagnostic marker on the reverse.

Those are business strikes not proof issues

Coinscratch

@Kliao said:
PCGS has no known examples of a 1969-S DDO proof.

Yet... But seriously, you can see my concern. Typically, or least I thought that whenever you see machine doubling you also see it on Lincolns profile. But I guess machine doubling can also be inconsistent.

Hemispherical

@Kliao said:

@Hemispherical said:
There’s a couple listed at Variety Vista:

http://varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/DDO 1969-S.htm

Check the date for the spread and diagnostic marker on the reverse.

Those are business strikes not proof issues

Oops!

Here’s the DD for 69S PR but it’s for the reverse:

http://www.doubleddie.com/314201.html

Coinscratch

@Hemispherical said:

@Kliao said:

@Hemispherical said:
There’s a couple listed at Variety Vista:

http://varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/DDO 1969-S.htm

Check the date for the spread and diagnostic marker on the reverse.

Those are business strikes not proof issues

Oops!

Here’s the DD for 69S PR but it’s for the reverse:

http://www.doubleddie.com/314201.html

Yes, I saw that listing earlier hence coming here for answers. The DDR has very subtle indications but definitely looks true vs. mine which looks like machine doubling but, mine has just enough shelf and in the right places to throw me off. I may submit it if I can't get away from it. Worse case scenario I will have 69 S PR62