Home Sports Talk

2019...Greatest Wimbledon final in history?

garnettstylegarnettstyle Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭✭

Todays Wimbledon final between Djokovic and Federer was the longest Wimbledon Final ever lasting 4 hrs and 57 minutes. The 13-12 fifth set lasted 2 hrs and 2 minutes. What a match. Tough loss for Federer considering he had 2 match points on his serve in the fifth set.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tennis/2019/07/14/novak-djokovic-vs-roger-federer-wimbledon-final-2019-live-score/?fbclid=IwAR2CIr8clNqT_H_b_cgJtqjbvqcwur8JhYmmq3Jy3gGWQDB5Y_KOP97oPF8

IT CAN'T BE A TRUE PLAYOFF UNLESS THE BIG TEN CHAMPIONS ARE INCLUDED

Comments

  • PatsGuy5000PatsGuy5000 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭

    Greatest I have seen, beats the less than an hour women’s final 😩

  • doubledragondoubledragon Posts: 23,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I missed it. I spent the day at the in-laws. It felt like a 4hr and 57 minute match being over there.

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 30,653 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I had no idea it was even on, even if I did I wouldn’t have given it a second thought but while I was in the grocery store the guy in front of me was talking to the checkout girl saying it was the best ever.

  • DrBusterDrBuster Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 5th set was ridiculous. I had to miss the tie break but saw sets 3-5, crazy long.

  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Federer is a Tennis machine, but father time is picking his pocket. Tennis is a young man's game. He has been a GREAT Champion.

  • garnettstylegarnettstyle Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭✭

    Wimbledon is now covered by three networks during the two week event...NBC, ESPN, and Tennis Channel. Back in the old days it was only covered by NBC, and HBO.

    IT CAN'T BE A TRUE PLAYOFF UNLESS THE BIG TEN CHAMPIONS ARE INCLUDED

  • TabeTabe Posts: 6,062 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DIMEMAN said:
    Tennis is a young man's game.

    Not right now at least. The top 3, and 8 of the top 12, are 29 or older.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 7,857 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 15, 2019 3:50PM

    epic match. very few athletes on planet earth with more resilience than joker. if the dude's head was inside a grizzly bear's mouth he'd find a way to escape and survive. when federer had two match points on his racket and 15,000 fans behind him, i harkened back to this........and this.

    for those who didn't see or don't remember these matches, yes, novak came back to win both as well.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTXRuOS0zss

    you'll never be able to outrun a bad diet

  • HallcoHallco Posts: 3,645 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I started watching in the 4th set. By the time the 5th set ended and they were going into the tie breaker, I had to leave the house. While I was in the grocery store, I decided to check and see who eventually won(close to an hour after leaving the house)...and it was not over!!! Ridiculous!

  • garnettstylegarnettstyle Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭✭

    This was the first Wimbledon final i watched. July 4th, 1982 between two Americans. A five set thriller that lasted 4 hrs, 16 minutes. Up to that point, it was the longest Wimbledon final in history.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lApSrH3tWCk

    IT CAN'T BE A TRUE PLAYOFF UNLESS THE BIG TEN CHAMPIONS ARE INCLUDED

  • Mickey71Mickey71 Posts: 4,252 ✭✭✭✭

    NO....not the greatest. My reasoning is because Federer did not win when serving up 8-7 in the 5th set. He played better than Novak in every single area of the match except the tiebreakers. If I wasn't a big fan, I may say that in those moments the pressure wore on the older player. Almost always the better player wins in tennis; but not on that day. Just to add- Novak obviously has nerves of steel. Very historical match.

Sign In or Register to comment.