Just saw the coin in hand a couple of days ago (post dip, of course). Hard to imagine that anyone who grades coins for a living, and has seen more than one Washington Quarter, would not grade this one better than 65.
Vern l It's not having what you want, it's wanting what you've got.
Comments
Based on the images provided, the appearance of the coin looked very different, post-dip. I can easily understand CAC's change in its' assessment.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Just saw the coin in hand a couple of days ago (post dip, of course). Hard to imagine that anyone who grades coins for a living, and has seen more than one Washington Quarter, would not grade this one better than 65.
l
It's not having what you want, it's wanting what you've got.