Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Rank these vintage cards.

akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
edited February 20, 2019 2:27PM in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

I know! Another pick which card you like best thread. But I gotta ask. This will be a loaded question.
After reviewing the spike in vintage prices over the last 6-7 years I have been thinking about what potential growth is still left in the vintage card market.

I know there are a lot of variables but what have you all noticed in terms of demand among the cards i'm highlighting today.

From this list:
Pick your top 3 for personal hobby (favorites) keepsake.
Pick another 3 for best solid investment moving forward. (Stability and potential price increase)

Some of my favorites through the years:
1) 1951 Bowman Mantle
2) 1952 Topps Mantle
3) T206 Cobb Portraits
4) 1933 Goudey Lajoie
5) T206 Magie error
6) Cracker Jack Cobb
7) 1933 Goudey Ruth (All variations)
8) 1954 Topps Aaron
9) 1968 Topps 3D Clemente
10) 1955 Topps Clemente

CU Ancient Members badge member.

Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

Comments

  • Options
    ahopkinsahopkins Posts: 1,095 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Top 3 Keepsakes:
    1) 1951 Bowman Mantle
    2) T206 Cobb Portraits
    3) 1955 Topps Clemente

    Top 3 Investment (This is not my forte)
    1) 1952 Topps Mantle
    2) Cracker Jack Cobb
    3) 1955 Topps Clemente

    There. I Tried.

    Andy

  • Options
    brad31brad31 Posts: 2,573 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Top 3 I would want

    1933 Goudey Ruth
    T206 Cobb
    Cracker Jack Cobb

    Top 3 Investments

    1952 Mantle
    1955 Clemente
    1954 Aaron

  • Options
    akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭

    I see the natural draw is for familiar names and cards. No love for the rarities like Lajoie and Magie?
    Very interesting. Keep them coming!

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • Options
    TiborTibor Posts: 3,260 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 20, 2019 10:26PM

    Fav's
    t-206 Cobbs
    t-206 Magie
    Goudey Ruths

    Invest.
    1951 Mantle
    1952 Mantle
    C J Cobb

  • Options
    swish54swish54 Posts: 688 ✭✭✭✭

    @akuracy503 said:
    I see the natural draw is for familiar names and cards. No love for the rarities like Lajoie and Magie?
    Very interesting. Keep them coming!

    Because those aren't household names like the others. Hard core card people know how rare those two are, but the average joe who just won thousands on the stock market and wants to get a big name card doesn't.

  • Options
    70ToppsFanatic70ToppsFanatic Posts: 2,104 ✭✭✭✭
    edited February 21, 2019 10:17AM

    You think he might have considered other true rarities like the Billy Ripken FF card?

    😉



    Dave
  • Options
    akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭

    @70ToppsFanatic said:
    You think he mike have considered other true rarities like the Billy Ripken FF card?

    😉

    The Billy Ripken FF card was my first ever error pulled from a cello pack when I was a kid. I hold it in high regard along side my Mantle cards.

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • Options
    akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭

    @swish54 said:

    @akuracy503 said:
    I see the natural draw is for familiar names and cards. No love for the rarities like Lajoie and Magie?
    Very interesting. Keep them coming!

    Because those aren't household names like the others. Hard core card people know how rare those two are, but the average joe who just won thousands on the stock market and wants to get a big name card doesn't.

    So do you think there are a lot of average Joe's dropping 5 figures and up for name brand cards these days?
    If that is truly a common scenario then the hobby demographics must be changing from what I knew.

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • Options
    swish54swish54 Posts: 688 ✭✭✭✭

    I wouldn't be surprised if they were. No different than someone buying a painting, or old car to diversify their disposable income.

Sign In or Register to comment.