Options
1801 Raw Half. Looks right....O-102 yes? Idea on grade?
Sheldon_Overton_Baby
Posts: 60 ✭
I leave it to the forum to chime in best they can from pictures.
0
Comments
XF/AU. But it does look bad. This is one to send to PCGS.
45
I’m going 53 on it. Great coin!
cleaned w/rim dings..... nice color though...
The coin has the attributes of 1801 T-1/O.102. Tompkins corrected the emission, as this die marriage came first in 1801, the reverse die was much better than used on T-2 which had rust pits.
Why would the dealer or collector leave thousands on the table by not getting a PCGS grade? What @habaraca stated and/or other issues probably kept it out of a slab. Nose is worn flat, EF 45 details.
BE is not right, along with the rim above it.
I like it. Toning on the obv exergue is interesting. I'm at XF due to face and cloud wear IMO. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
agreed O-102
BHNC #203