Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Which card is more "Worthy"??

Looking for opinions, there is no wrong answer. I will add that neither of these cards are mine.

1

2

Promethius881969@yahoo.com

Comments

  • countdouglascountdouglas Posts: 2,472 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Number 1

  • krisd3279krisd3279 Posts: 808 ✭✭✭✭

    Number 1. Better centering, newer flip and no visible scratches on the holder.

    Kris

    My 1971 Topps adventure - Davis Men in Black

  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭

    1, bad chip or nick on bottom right of #2 on boarder!!

  • jay0791jay0791 Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭✭

    1

    scratches deter from the card in 2

    Collecting PSA... FB,BK,HK,and BB HOF RC sets
    1948-76 Topps FB Sets
    FB & BB HOF Player sets
    1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
  • craig44craig44 Posts: 11,407 ✭✭✭✭✭

    number 1

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • PROMETHIUS88PROMETHIUS88 Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Agree with all comments. The scan and the holder on #2 for sure don't help the card and does appear that is a nick on the lower right hand side. On the flip side, appears #1 has touches to the 2 bottom corners while #2 seems to have at least 3 sharp corners.
    Now, the only reason I ask is that #2 is listed as a BIN for $179 while the PWCC card sold for $259. I'm just not seeing that much difference in the actual card itself. Power of the PWCC strikes again!
    Thanks for playing along guys!!

    Promethius881969@yahoo.com
  • GreenSneakersGreenSneakers Posts: 913 ✭✭✭✭

    I’ll agree with crowd that 1is preferable, but also would consider premium difference between the 2. Assuming they are both for sale, what the price spread?

  • PROMETHIUS88PROMETHIUS88 Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @GreenSneakers said:
    I’ll agree with crowd that 1is preferable, but also would consider premium difference between the 2. Assuming they are both for sale, what the price spread?

    1 sold for $259 and #2 is for sale for $179. I'm not seeing a 50% premium

    Promethius881969@yahoo.com
  • PROMETHIUS88PROMETHIUS88 Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What the heck is with this giant font??

    Promethius881969@yahoo.com
  • countdouglascountdouglas Posts: 2,472 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PROMETHIUS88 said:
    What the heck is with this giant font??

    I just figured you were really ANGRY AND ANNOYED AND JUST SHOUTING FOR NO REASON! Haha!

  • ahopkinsahopkins Posts: 1,103 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1

    Andy

  • brad31brad31 Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cannot tell if scratch is on holder or card on his leg in #2

  • countdouglascountdouglas Posts: 2,472 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All 3 of the large type posts in this thread start with a number. Perhaps that is the trigger for the large type to appear???

  • PROMETHIUS88PROMETHIUS88 Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think it is using the number sign...or as the kids call it today, hashtag. Lets see

    1 this is a test

    Promethius881969@yahoo.com
  • PROMETHIUS88PROMETHIUS88 Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yep...number sign/hashtag makes the text following it larger.

    Promethius881969@yahoo.com
Sign In or Register to comment.