MY GOD! $10,505.00 for a Silver Eagle Proof
Eagleman
Posts: 21
On ebay i just saw a 1995W PCGS PR70 Silver American Eagle at $10.505 and still climbing! I guess it must be the coin in the Robert B. Lecce collection in the Registry as this is the only one i know of that PCGS has graded PR70. This tells me that i will have to sumit coins to have a PR70 as i sure wont pay that kind of money for a silver eagle!
Am always looking to buy any American Eagle Silver proof PCGS PR70DCAM
0
Comments
For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
-Laura Swenson
In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
Camelot
Sean
1995 W proof 70
Bill
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
It really does surprise me that this coin has traded so many times in such a short period of time.
IMHO, PCGS really puts themselves at risk if this coin is not 100% "perfect" (by their decision to not grade any more PR70 Eagles for all practical purposes). And, if the coin really is "perfect", then why flip it at least 3x-4x in a year or so by my count? Very bizarre. Wondercoin
For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
-Laura Swenson
In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
Pete
I don't collect modern slabbed proofs, so it may not be my place to say... but could this coin really be worth that much of a premium above a PF69DCAM PQ+? Especially since (as many report on this board) PCGS is not giving our 70's anymore. I don't get it.
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
al h.
That's precisely why it's "worth" so much, PCGS has stopped giving out 70s -- not because of the coins, but because of a simple change in policy. And if that policy changes back the other way... look out. Same thing can happen (either way) with MS grades too, of course.
but if the sale record for this coin is accurate, we are all the fool for not buying it when it was originally sold since that person made a very tidy profit
Tough to argue with that, too. As long as you change "coin" to "coin/plastic".
<< <i>The 1995-W was sold in a private treaty to the current eBay seller. I don't discuss what I sell coins for out of respect for the buyer. He never listed it so I've kept it in my Registry Set until someone else wants to list it. >>
For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
-Laura Swenson
In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
Great insight. The Silver Eagle proof is one of the most beautiful coins you can collect. And if this coin really is the best single example of the series, all value bets are off. However, if PCGS is no longer giving out a 70, isn't it possible (likely?) that some of the coins being sent in now are the same level of quality? If that is the case, and you heed the advice of so many on this forum to "buy the coin and not the holder", then can this type of price premium be supported by the coin itself? I don't see how, and what you're left with is a huge premium for the slab and the chance to say you have the best set in the registry. I suppose it's worth $10K+ to someone to say that, but not me.
I have a proposal for PCGS. Bring back the 70. If it is the highest grade, it must be attainable. To make sure the grade is warranted, consider a special internal approval process to give the 70, perhaps a special review board. Thought?
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
Pete
al h.
Gets to the heart of the honesty issue.
DAM
There was an entire (quite heated) thread a while back about this sort of thing. You can also just register coins from inserts of coins that have been broken out. I know my dealer has hundreds of these in an envelope by his desk. He will eventually send them back to PCGS to be removed from the reports. PCGS gives no incentive for anyone to return them, so most have quit doing it.
I am sure most of the top sets (except the Proof Silver Eagle of course) exist with the owner actually in possession of all of the coins.
Great insight. The Silver Eagle proof is one of the most beautiful coins you can collect.
Yep, they're pretty.
And if this coin really is the best single example of the series, all value bets are off.
PCGS says it's the best.
However, if PCGS is no longer giving out a 70, isn't it possible (likely?) that some of the coins being sent in now are the same level of quality?
Virtually certain.
If that is the case, and you heed the advice of so many on this forum to "buy the coin and not the holder", then can this type of price premium be supported by the coin itself?
Not in this lifetime.
I don't see how, and what you're left with is a huge premium for the slab and the chance to say you have the best set in the registry. I suppose it's worth $10K+ to someone to say that, but not me.
Of course, some people have different priorities and/or more money than you and I. If that $15K meant no more than $50 does to me, I might buy it.
Regarding PCGS PR70 policy, they should have never started giving out the grade, or they should have been more consistent with it. As it is now, they've created some plastic rarities that sell for extraordinary premiums, and it has nothing to do with the coin.
Many coins that are in PR70 holders don't deserve the grade, but they attained it under a looser standard. And many coins in PR69 holders deserve the grade, but won't get it under current standards.
It's a mess, and the only good way I can see out of it is far too expensive for PCGS (a six-month deadline to regrade all old PR70s under the current standards, and old PR70s no longer count in the registry).
By the way, MS collectors can't smugly stand by... many of the same points apply to many low-pop super-grade high-dollar coins. At current prices things are getting a little wiggy in my opinion. And not just moderns.
I certainly hope no one would intentionally do such a thing. I can see selling a registry set, a coin/few coins from a registry set, and unintentionally forgetting to delete it/them. But to knowingly, willfully not deleting a coin/set is deceitful.
Is this what the Registry Set has brought us to? The Mike Tyson school of winning?
I certainly hope not. I hope all the Registry Set participants show off their sets in the spirit of competition. Not having to use a win at all costs attitude. I am assembling my sets not to compete, but rather to show off to those who participate in this hobby my accomplishments. And that's how I view others' Registry Sets. If I finish 1st, 5th, 10th, or 42nd it doesn't matter. I'm still proud of what I have.
DAM
But wouldn't it be worth 20 million ? It would to me !!
Howie
Thank goodness coin collecting is a non-contact hobby.