Digging on those last two Chester McGlockton rookies! I met him back in 1991 at Clemson when I was there on a recruiting visit. We were allowed down on the field and in the locker room after the game. He was a mountain of a man and ended up giving me the Clemson armbands he wore during the game. Gone too soon, RIP
I don't understand why 1992 Favres have the va,i.e. they do when his stadium club rookie card is 1991. I think we should all be buying 1991 boxes to open!!
@rtimmer said:
I don't understand why 1992 Favres have the va,i.e. they do when his stadium club rookie card is 1991. I think we should all be buying 1991 boxes to open!!
Guess it is like Mantle’s second card being more than his ‘51 rookie.
@rtimmer said:
I don't understand why 1992 Favres have the va,i.e. they do when his stadium club rookie card is 1991. I think we should all be buying 1991 boxes to open!!
Guess it is like Mantle’s second card being more than his ‘51 rookie.
I actually get that one where topps is more collected and 1952 topps is the set of the century.
Kind of like Jordan 1986 fleer is worth more than 1985 star because of the manufacturer and set difference as well.
What I still don't understand is why a second year card from the same manufacturer holds that value and not the rookie card??
"rtimmer Posts: 894 ✭✭✭ September 14, 2018 7:02PM
I don't understand why 1992 Favres have the va,i.e. they do when his stadium club rookie card is 1991. I think we should all be buying 1991 boxes to open!!"
From my time working at a card shop in the 1990's while I was in college, I believe 1992 TSC high numbers Football were a big deal because they weren't offered directly to hobby shops and there were supposedly only 300 cases produced.
For a 100 card set, there's some serious star power there other than the Frofrah. Five Frofrahs is outstanding. The power of the Mike Ults is undeniable.
@rtimmer '84 Star Jordan is worth more than the '86 Fleer.
@ReggieCleveland said:
For a 100 card set, there's some serious star power there other than the Frofrah. Five Frofrahs is outstanding. The power of the Mike Ults is undeniable.
@rtimmer '84 Star Jordan is worth more than the '86 Fleer.
Seacrest OUT!
Agreed but I said 1986 Jordan Fleer is worth more than 1985 Jordan Star which I still think it is.
Now back to the topic at hand... Why is the Favre 1992 TSC worth more than the rookie 1991 TSC card?
@rtimmer from what I remember back then it was because way less 92 SC hit the market compared to 91 SC. The 92s were hard as heck at the time to get your hands on. Also probably doesn't hurt the fact that 92 has him in a Packers jersey compared to 91 which doesn't. I have owned a few 91s over the years since it is his rookie and have never cared to pay more for a 92 since it isn't his rookie (I am with ya that I don't care if it is more scarce).
BALROG
Posts: 587 ✭✭✭
Comments
Robert Brooks was a pretty good Packer.
I think he may have invented the Lambeau Leap.
saucywombat@hotmail.com
Rather pricey coaster.
Good luck my man...hope you pull some GEMMY MINT Brett Fav-ra’s...
Bears fan here, and i still to this day have nightmares after he roasted Donnell Woolford (who was a good corner) for 99 on MNF
love your rips Balrog.......gl dude
Digging on those last two Chester McGlockton rookies! I met him back in 1991 at Clemson when I was there on a recruiting visit. We were allowed down on the field and in the locker room after the game. He was a mountain of a man and ended up giving me the Clemson armbands he wore during the game. Gone too soon, RIP
eBay Store
Greg Maddux #1 Master SetGreg Maddux #2 Basic Set
Actually, I believe LeRoy Butler invented the Lambeau Leap.
2 Favres - nice
saucywombat@hotmail.com
Damn. That was a nice box! Congrats! Good luck with the grades.
Those Favre's look good, Congrats.
Eric
Erikthredd’s MJ Collection: https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/publishedset/395035
Erikthredd’s Nike Air Jordan Collection: https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/basketball/key-card-sets/nike-poster-cards-michael-jordan-1985-1992/alltimeset/408486
Best of luck on the Favre subs.
Looks pretty nasty to me... Not the cards, they look great... I'm talking about the Michelob Ultra.
DesertIceSports.Com
I wonder how many Favre cards one should normally expect in a box? 3?
yeah, my bad on the math
-- assuming you paid around $400 for the box, if you can get even a couple PSA 10's, it's been a worthwhile excursion....
I don't understand why 1992 Favres have the va,i.e. they do when his stadium club rookie card is 1991. I think we should all be buying 1991 boxes to open!!
Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
That last Farva-ra is the nicest. Late to the party but thanks for sharing
Kevin
Kevin
Guess it is like Mantle’s second card being more than his ‘51 rookie.
I actually get that one where topps is more collected and 1952 topps is the set of the century.
Kind of like Jordan 1986 fleer is worth more than 1985 star because of the manufacturer and set difference as well.
What I still don't understand is why a second year card from the same manufacturer holds that value and not the rookie card??
Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
"rtimmer Posts: 894 ✭✭✭ September 14, 2018 7:02PM
I don't understand why 1992 Favres have the va,i.e. they do when his stadium club rookie card is 1991. I think we should all be buying 1991 boxes to open!!"
From my time working at a card shop in the 1990's while I was in college, I believe 1992 TSC high numbers Football were a big deal because they weren't offered directly to hobby shops and there were supposedly only 300 cases produced.
For a 100 card set, there's some serious star power there other than the Frofrah. Five Frofrahs is outstanding. The power of the Mike Ults is undeniable.
@rtimmer '84 Star Jordan is worth more than the '86 Fleer.
Seacrest OUT!
Like 93 Finest, weren't these also like $10 per pack at release?
What’s that rocket card? Don’t remember that. Just the pro set and classic cards
Agreed but I said 1986 Jordan Fleer is worth more than 1985 Jordan Star which I still think it is.
Now back to the topic at hand... Why is the Favre 1992 TSC worth more than the rookie 1991 TSC card?
Just because someone paid more for it on day 1?
Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
@rtimmer from what I remember back then it was because way less 92 SC hit the market compared to 91 SC. The 92s were hard as heck at the time to get your hands on. Also probably doesn't hurt the fact that 92 has him in a Packers jersey compared to 91 which doesn't. I have owned a few 91s over the years since it is his rookie and have never cared to pay more for a 92 since it isn't his rookie (I am with ya that I don't care if it is more scarce).
1992 Topps stadium club football series 3
I am looking for can u help
bwhiteside2680@gmail.com
bwhiteside2680@gmail.com