Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1971 PSA Strictness

I just bought a couple of PSA 8 1971s and I can’t believe how nice they are. I truly think today’s PSA 8 is as nice as the PSA 9 of yesteryear. I hated the strictness when I was submitting but I love it as a buyer! New flips all the way for 1971.

Comments

  • divecchiadivecchia Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those are some black beauties!!! :+1::+1:

    Congrats on your pickups.

    Donato

    Hobbyist & Collector (not an investor).
    Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set

    Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
  • brad31brad31 Posts: 2,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those cards are definitely strong for the grade. Very nice.

  • TheDudeAbidesTheDudeAbides Posts: 400 ✭✭✭

    Where's the 8.5 love for the Vance?

    Collecting 64, 66, 67, 70 & 71 Baseball. Cubs, wax, cello & rack baseball.
  • jay0791jay0791 Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭✭

    Love the Klimkowski
    if its 4 sale let me know

    Collecting PSA... FB,BK,HK,and BB HOF RC sets
    1948-76 Topps FB Sets
    FB & BB HOF Player sets
    1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
  • BaltimoreYankeeBaltimoreYankee Posts: 3,024 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those are two beauties right there! Great cards from a really tough set. I agree that the standards are tougher now - when I see cards (in general, not just '71's) in older flips, I am more critical of them.

    Daniel
  • edited August 4, 2018 7:39AM
    This content has been removed.
  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,453 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have only 1 psa 8 1971 card that i graded myself. i bought it back in the 80's. graded with beckett first and received a 7.5. cut it out and had it graded with psa and got an 8. i agree they are tough on the 1971 issue. oh by the way it is a nolan ryan.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • craig44craig44 Posts: 11,407 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those are great looking cards my only 8 is a blyleven.

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • countdouglascountdouglas Posts: 2,474 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 1971 registry set is not one that I really pursue with much vigor, usually as an afterthought once I've made a purchase of something else. And then usually only when I decide to browse the seller's other items with the free or reduced shipping charges that would come with an additional purchase.

    I have 1 complete raw 1971 set, another raw 71 set around 90 percent, and another partial that is maybe 60-70 percent complete, in descending condition from set 1 to set 3, so many times my graded pickups are when I get them on the cheap, with the intent that I may someday crack them out to fill or upgrade a set. (As has been noted on several previous threads, quite often people bid up nice raw cards for more than you have to pay for a similar range graded card. Hence the logic behind that route...)

    However, until that day comes, I still have them entered into a registry set. I'm only around #120, with a bit over 10 percent complete, with mostly 7s and nothing lower than a 6.

    These are my only NQ 8s, all in the old flips. Your 2 additions certainly put my 8 cards to shame.

    @PaulMaul - Very nice pickups for yourself, indeed!

  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,889 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 4, 2018 5:51PM

    I gave up on the registry for this set because too many cards I was happy with came back 7s...which made me less happy with them! Now I have a combination raw/graded set consisting of raw cards I’m happy with and graded cards I buy. No more submitting 71s for me!

  • CSUrunandstunCSUrunandstun Posts: 573 ✭✭✭

    I just submitted about 125 of 'em....got 8's on Aaron and Ryan (which I sent in at a higher level...next 75 or so should pop next week and the rest just went in on a newer submission

    Successful transactions with FavreFan1971, ffishonn, Davemri, Publius, DavidPuddy, frcarvell, recbball, and many others...
  • gemintgemint Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I find '71s as really hit or miss depending on the grader. I submitted a bunch of 71s from a high grade set and was getting 6s and 7s on cards that normally would get 8s. Then I submitted a small grouping over a few subs and popped as many 9s on those subs as I had in the entire history of subbing '71s which probably totals 3,000 cards.

  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,889 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 5, 2018 1:22PM

    It does get very frustrating looking at beautiful cards in 7 holders as you scroll through ugly 8s on the ‘bay.

  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,889 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @gemint said:
    I find '71s as really hit or miss depending on the grader. I submitted a bunch of 71s from a high grade set and was getting 6s and 7s on cards that normally would get 8s. Then I submitted a small grouping over a few subs and popped as many 9s on those subs as I had in the entire history of subbing '71s which probably totals 3,000 cards.

    I think it boils down to what the grader views as “slight wear” to a corner. Some view any hint of white as wear, but I think that’s extreme.

Sign In or Register to comment.