Options
1877 Mexico 8 reales, centering dot?
KensCoins2287
Posts: 138 ✭✭✭
What do you think of the dot, above the right leg of the eagle, on the reverse of this coin? I was thinking maybe a centering dot, but it seems big. any insights would be appreciated, thanks!
1
Comments
I have no insights, but I have seen this kind of thing before. Wouldn't deter me from serious consideration of buying the coin if the price was right, the weight was right, etc. Maybe twenty years ago, I wouldn't have even checked the weight!
Way too big to be a centering dot. But I don’t know what it is.
Interesting. So 2 thoughts are, is the artifact in the dead center? And is there a second depression toward the 3 o'clock? which may be part of a second circle. Inquiring minds want to know. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall
Really hard to tell from the picture, but another possibility is this could be a small circular Chinese chopmark. They are known on coins of this period from this mint.
Definitely a possibility. A chop would be incuse. A centering dot would be raised.
The old timers at ANA Summer Seminar (mid 1990s) were not concerned this with kind of mark, but I don't remember exactly what they said. I believe they thought it had something to do with die production, I may have written their explanation down but would need to find my notes. I don't believe their explanation involved any chopmark.
Whatever they told me, it left me unconconcerned - coins with this dot are seen from time to time and they give me no anxieties.
@Swamperbob has a friend who is writing a book on this series. I've not seen one without the cactus thorns. I have seen the dot before. I always assumed it was for centering.
The dot is in fact a centering dot. The centering dots used at Guanajuato in the mid 1870s are a subject that would need a very long article to cover. They run from a more normal tiny dot to very large circles - some even come with a circle and center dot like a bull's eye. There has never been an acceptable reason for this development but they are VERY interesting.
The cactus spines are a finishing touch for dies of this period at Guanjuato - so the die was used before it was technically finished, fairly common.
Thanks Swamperbob, I needed that explanation. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall
@Swamperbob Thank you for the insight! I find these type of things fascinating!
@Swamperbob
Is that very pronounced circle seen on the 1875-Go issue a centering dot?
Here is a photo I pulled off the PCGS website (not my coin) --
Jeff
Resplandoes mention the dot as "interesting" but not a variety.
They indicate the die style was struck from 1873-1886 . So the dot can appear on coins from those years .
Mostly common dates but the 1873 GO FR is scarce and elusive in high grade .
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.