Best Of

@MFeld said:

@PerryHall said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@BAJJERFAN said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@CaptHenway said:
Hypothetical scenario:
Party A gives Party B $15 million to buy gold.
Gold arrives.
Party A colludes with Party C to pick up gold using insider knowledge.
Party C picks up gold.
Party A shows at Party B with receipts for $15 million and says “Where’s my gold?”

Still only a single score

He is either going to get replacement gold or an insurance check so double score. He has the original gold which the seller doesn't know about. You don't need to be a Perry Mason in order to figure it out.

No. He paid $15 million, Perry. He could end up with $30 million in gold, but he paid for half of it. It's a single "score".

Why did you address me rather than the person you are responding to?

He didn’t. He was addressing Perry Mason/ BAJJERFAN, who made a reference to the other “Perry”.

I was joking. LOL.
I imagine quite a few of the younger members here never heard of Perry Mason.

@Copperindian said:

@alaura22 said:

@PerryHall said:

@MFeld said:

@PerryHall said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@BAJJERFAN said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@CaptHenway said:
Hypothetical scenario:
Party A gives Party B $15 million to buy gold.
Gold arrives.
Party A colludes with Party C to pick up gold using insider knowledge.
Party C picks up gold.
Party A shows at Party B with receipts for $15 million and says “Where’s my gold?”

Still only a single score

He is either going to get replacement gold or an insurance check so double score. He has the original gold which the seller doesn't know about. You don't need to be a Perry Mason in order to figure it out.

No. He paid $15 million, Perry. He could end up with $30 million in gold, but he paid for half of it. It's a single "score".

Why did you address me rather than the person you are responding to?

He didn’t. He was addressing Perry Mason/ BAJJERFAN, who made a reference to the other “Perry”.

I was joking. LOL.
I imagine quite a few of the younger members here never heard of Perry Mason.

If they don't know Perry (mason) then they don't know Della Street......................

Or Paul Drake….

Or Hamilton Burger…

but maybe they do know Hamburglar?

@Onastone said:

@eCoinquest said:

This coin is one of the most aesthetically pleasing original designs out in modern coinage and a real gold version seems like it has good potential. Now lets get a privy mark too

Nooooo, don't even put that out there, a privy mark would clutter up the "aesthetically pleasing" design...we do not need more privy marks.

You could always just ad your own chop mark, which would kind of be like a privy.

Buy them if you like them to save or are addicted like me. Enjoy them while alive because your kids or grand kids will sell them for melt and buy pot.
I stopped buying and sold off everything a few years ago, however in a moment of weakness I fell off the wagon.
Hi my name is Hattrick and I’m an addict.

@BozoOnBus said:
Sounds like party B has been negligent in releasing the Gold!?? This whole incident has been so devoid of facts, and public information one has to wonder what really happened here!???
Clearly insider information was utilized, yet no arrests have been announced!! What's going on behind the curtain!!???

They are apparently waiting for one of us to figure it out for them.

It says on the holder.

887

I just got one, and love this issue of an actual gold Sacagawea dollar!

Maybe I'll carry it as a pocket piece... hope I don't spent it!