Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

PMD or some type of clip on an IHC

What's the story with this IHC?

image

Comments

  • Options
    ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 7,903 ✭✭✭✭
    fixed
    image
  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 31,565 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Need a bigger picture.
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • Options
    tightbudgettightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭
    Looks like lamination but would definitely want to see a bigger picture before making a final conclusion
  • Options
    ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 7,903 ✭✭✭✭
    Pic enlarged
  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 31,565 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What is the reverse like behind that area?
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • Options
    ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 7,903 ✭✭✭✭
    The reverse looks normal btw
  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 31,565 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination.
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • Options
    ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 7,903 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination. >>



    Thank you Captain!
  • Options
    dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,017 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination. >>



    Technically, that is not correct.
    It is a delamination.
  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 31,565 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination. >>



    Technically, that is not correct.
    It is a delamination. >>



    I was simply using the term that the rest of the world uses.
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • Options
    keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    are you sure it isn't unlaminated??
  • Options
    IrishMikeyIrishMikey Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭
    Dan is right, it is a lamination that has peeled off the coin, hence a "delamination." And
    Tom is also right, not too many in the numismatic world use anything more than lamination.

    Now shake hands and come out writing, both of you! I think I can speak for most on this
    forum when I say that we REALLY enjoy your posts.
  • Options
    dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,017 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination. >>



    Technically, that is not correct.
    It is a delamination. >>



    I was simply using the term that the rest of the world uses. >>



    Technically, the rest of the world is wrong image


    PS:
    "Technically Correct" is the best kind of correct (according to Futurama).

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file