Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
<< <i>If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination. >>
Technically, that is not correct. It is a delamination. >>
I was simply using the term that the rest of the world uses.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Dan is right, it is a lamination that has peeled off the coin, hence a "delamination." And Tom is also right, not too many in the numismatic world use anything more than lamination.
Now shake hands and come out writing, both of you! I think I can speak for most on this forum when I say that we REALLY enjoy your posts.
Comments
<< <i>If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination. >>
Thank you Captain!
<< <i>If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination. >>
Technically, that is not correct.
It is a delamination.
<< <i>
<< <i>If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination. >>
Technically, that is not correct.
It is a delamination. >>
I was simply using the term that the rest of the world uses.
Tom is also right, not too many in the numismatic world use anything more than lamination.
Now shake hands and come out writing, both of you! I think I can speak for most on this
forum when I say that we REALLY enjoy your posts.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>If the reverse is normal, then it is probably a lamination. >>
Technically, that is not correct.
It is a delamination. >>
I was simply using the term that the rest of the world uses. >>
Technically, the rest of the world is wrong
PS:
"Technically Correct" is the best kind of correct (according to Futurama).