Options
Please give me your grade assessment of these 10 Proof Jefferson Nickels.

I know the pictures aren't the best, but give me your grade assessment of the 10 Coins pictured below. The 1941 and 1956 Proofs are toned so I took an angled picture of those two. Other than that the pictures are simple with overhead lighting, shot straight-on with nothing done afterwards except cropping/sizing. Thanks in advance.
Al H.











Al H.












0
Comments
Hoard the keys.
<< <i>anyone else?? >>
Do you like them?
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
1941---
1953---
1954---
1956---
1959---
1963---
1968---
1970---
1970---
1971---
thanks in advance!!
1953---pr67
1954---pr66cam
1956---pr66
1959---pr66
1963---pr67cam
1968---pr67dcam
1970---pr67cam
1970---pr68cam
1971---pr67
guesstimates merely n meekly
My guess:
1941---65
1953---66
1954---66
1956---66cam
1959---66cam
1963---67cam
1968---67Dcam
1970---68Dcam
1970---67cam
1971---67Dcam
The 54 is a sure shot cam and possibly even ucam at NGC.
The 59 I believe would go cam, iffy on the reverse.
The rest after the 59 are easy cam, but very common and you could probably pick up some nice one already slabbed that wouldn't cost too much a premium.
All in all nice bunch. I say stick with slabbing the 41, 54 and 59 and you'll do ok.
<< <i>c'mon guys, how 'bout a little help??? there's a reason why i'm asking but i don't want to let the cat out of the proverbial bag just yet. please, please, please just some honest appraisals of the grade of the coins in a format that makes it easy for me to read. simply cut/paste the following and add the grades......................
1941---
1953---
1954---
1956---
1959---
1963---
1968---
1970---
1970---
1971---
thanks in advance!!
Most look the same to me..........does that help?
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
I can't grade proofs for shi* ... especially from pictures, but here's the WAG
1941--- 65
1953--- 66
1954--- 66CAM - shot 67? and my personal favorite of the group
1956--- 66
1959--- 66CAM
1963--- 66CAM
1968--- 67DCAM
1970--- 66CAM
1970--- 65CAM
1971--- 67CAM
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
1941---pr65
1953---pr67
1954---pr66cam
1956---pr65
1959---pr67cam
1963---pr68cam
1968---pr69dcam
1970---pr68dcam
1970---pr68dcam
1971---pr68dcam
Ill give a stab:
#1 PR66
#2 PR67
#3 PR68
#4 PR67
#5 PR68
#6 PR68CAM
#7 PR67DCAM
#8 PR67CAM
#9 PR68CAM
#10 PR68CAM
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
1941---PR62
1953---PR66
1954---PR63
1956---PR64
1959---PR67
1963---PR66DCAM
1968---PR67DCAM
1970---PR66DCAM
1970---PR66DCAM
1971---PR66DCAM
2. PR66
3. PR65
4. PR66
5. PR65
6. PR65CAM
7. PR67
8. PR65
9. PR67CAM
10. PR66
1941--- 66
1953--- 65
1954--- 64 CAM
1956--- 67
1959--- 66 CAM
1963--- 65 DCAM
1968--- 68 DCAM
1970--- 67 DCAM
1970--- 66 DCAM
1971--- 67 DCAM
Thanks for the giveaway.
Steve
In memory of the USAF Security Forces lost: A1C Elizabeth N. Jacobson, 9/28/05; SSgt Brian McElroy, 1/22/06; TSgt Jason Norton, 1/22/06; A1C Lee Chavis, 10/14/06; SSgt John Self, 5/14/07; A1C Jason Nathan, 6/23/07; SSgt Travis Griffin, 4/3/08; 1Lt Joseph Helton, 9/8/09; SrA Nicholas J. Alden, 3/3/2011. God Bless them and all those who have lost loved ones in this war. I will never forget their loss.
Glen
1941---PR64
1953---PR65
1954---PR66CAM
1956---PR65
1959---PR66CAM
1963---PR66CAM
1968---PR67DCAM
1970---PR65CAM
1970---PR65CAM
1971---PR66CAM
I just love them thar jefferson threads
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>c'mon guys, how 'bout a little help??? there's a reason why i'm asking but i don't want to let the cat out of the proverbial bag just yet. please, please, please just some honest appraisals of the grade of the coins in a format that makes it easy for me to read. simply cut/paste the following and add the grades......................
1941---66
1953---65
1954---66
1956---65
1959---65cam
1963---64cam
1968---67dcam
1970---65 dcam
1970---65dcam
1971---65 dcam
I have found power in the mysteries of thought.
It is always a question of knowing and seeing, and not that of believing.
Our virtues, and our failings are inseparable, like force, and matter. When they separate, man is no more.
.
<< <i>well, grades finally posted so i'll wait till the coins return to photograph in the holders and then i'll post a thread detailing the project. >>
hmmmmmmmmmmm
seems I just pm'd bout this puppy 2 seconds ago.
any update?
no rush, I know I am buried in BS, I hope your situation isn't the same
But I really am getting ansey here
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
What did your grades look like?
What's your thoughts on this piece? Sratches on holder. Does the reverse need conservation?
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
1941 - PR64
1953 - PR65CAM
1954 - PR66DCAM
1956 - PR66
1959 - PR67CAM
1963 - PR66DCAM
1968 - AMAAZZZING! - PR69DCAM
1970 - PR67CAM
1970 - PR67CAM
1971 - PR67DCAM
Of course all of those grades are +/- 2 points for invisible hairlines.
EDIT - LOL - didn't look at the post date...that 1957 is great BG...I'd say 67CAM with a shot at DCAM.
41 - PF64
53 - PF65
54 - PF66CAM
56 - PF65
59 - PF65CAM
63 - PF66CAM
68S - PF67DCAM
First 70S - PF67CAM
Second 70S - PF66DCAM
71S - PF66CAM
Was I even remotely close?
The results of my little Jefferson Nickel Project a thread by Keets.
1941---65
1953---67
1954---68 CAM
1956---67
1959---67
1963---67 CAM
1968---68 CAM
1970---67 CAM
1970---68 CAM
1971---67 CAM
Interesting that my grade opinions of today, 4-3-2011, matched 7 out of 10 of Mirabella's grade opinions posted on 5-25-2008, almost 3 years ago.
Interesting also that I nailed 3 out of 10 grades [the 1954, 1968 and the second 1970]; and that my other seven grades were all LOWER than the grades assigned by PCGS. I must have subconsciously been harsher grading from pictures [where blemishes appear to be present which either are not present on the coin in hand, or are not as noticeable when viewing the coin in hand]. Or maybe I am, for these ten nickels, just stricter than PCGS for this one day.
Drunner