Do you think the reverse of this Sesqui. is scratched?

BigE · November 14, 2003 2:31AM

LINK TO SESQUI---------BigE

Placid · November 14, 2003 2:34AM

No

XpipedreamR · November 14, 2003 2:38AM

Because of the way they move over the fields and devices, I would have to guess that the scratches are not on the coin. I'd certainly make sure before bidding.

I'd also hope they they would mention such a scratch in the description. I don't think PCGS would slab it if those were scratches, either.

BigE · November 14, 2003 9:43AM

TTT-any more opinions?--------BigE

airplanenut · November 14, 2003 9:45AM

I'd think it very unlikely- something that prominent on the coin would be a BB

BillJones · November 14, 2003 10:02AM

There's not way that the black lines that show up on that photo could have been on the coin when it was graded. And if they are there now, are they on the slab or on the coin? If they are on the coin, how did they get to a coin in a sealed slab?

Still is this coin an MS-65. Here's a PQ MS-64 with which you can compare it.

Louis · November 14, 2003 10:09AM

BigE · November 14, 2003 10:18AM

PCGS needs to have a 64.5 grade especially for these coins

---------BigE

BillJones · November 14, 2003 10:58AM

<< <i>PCGS needs to have a 64.5 grade especially for these coins---------BigE >>

On the surface that might seem like a good idea, but when you think about it, it really isn't. We have too much trouble getting the WHOLE numbers right. Let's leave out the decimal points.

Do you think the reverse of this Sesqui. is scratched?

Comments

Leave a Comment