Home U.S. Coin Forum

Basic coin grading tips- part ll - still more replies

coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
For those of you who did not see part one of this discussion, here is a link:

Link



EXAMINING COINS

Now it's time to discuss examining/viewing coins properly.

First, make sure you don't have your pet dog, cat (or snake) anywhere near where you will be studying your treasures.The same goes for babies and significant others - this is serious business and you need to be able to concentrate!

Lighting has already been discussed but I did neglect to mention that blinds or shades should be drawn so that your light source is not interfered with by any outside light.

If you have coins that are uncertified and completely out of any type of holder, I'd recommend that you have something soft and yielding (a towel, a felt tray, etc.) underneath where you will be holding the coins, in case you drop one (or two). The best/sharpest coin graders are not necessarily the most sure-handed!

I do recommend that you remove uncertified coins from their 2x2's, etc., to get a proper look - even the thinnest layer of plastic can mask flaws and prevent you from getting the view that you should.

Be conscious of how easy it is to put fingerprints on your beauties. I have seen a lot of people start off by holding coins at their edges, but gradually lose concentration and allow their long and or fat fingers to move from the edge to the surface of the coin.

To get the best possible look at a coin it is imperative that you tilt and gradually rotate it so that the light bounces off of it from as many angles as possible. A coin can look completely different, if looked at head-on, vs. from an angle. Light reflects differently and colors and luster can look different, as well. You might see hairlines, cleaning, wipes or other problems from one angle that you wont see from another angle. Look at a coin from all angles, top to bottom, right side up, sideways and upside down, etc. This is a simple concept but you'd be surprised at the number of people who don't do it right.

I know some graders who start off looking at the reverses of coins first just to get a different perspective. I know others who begin, looking at coins sideways instead of up and down, for the same reason. I don't usually do those things but it's probably a good idea to try it once in a while, just for a change in your routine.

When you take your first look at a coin, do so without a glass/magnifier. Eyeball it for a few seconds on each side to get a general first impression - to see how it hits you. Don't worry, initially, about looking for flaws and problems - get a feel for the big picture and the eye-appeal or lack thereof.

I cannot over-emphasize the fact, that in many cases, the first, split second look of a coin is extremely important. It will either grab your attention or not. If it doesn't, it might not be so special and it might not impress the next viewer, either. If it is special looking and grabs your attention right away, it very well might have the same effect on the next person. Many buying decisions regarding many valuable coins are made in a matter of seconds, based on that all-important first impression.

Look at the focal points - the main design elements (the cheek on a Morgan dollar, Ms. Liberty on a Walking Liberty Half dollar, the Indian on Indian gold coinage, etc.) If you have questions about the most important areas for grading for a given type of coin, please feel free to ask.

Next, look at the other areas, toward the borders. As you are doing this, you should be slowly and gradually rotating the coin and tilting it back and forth (as mentioned previously) at the same time - try to get the light to reflect off of the surface from as many angles as possible.

Now, for those of you who are dying to do so, it is ok to pick up your magnifiers - go for it, but don't forget about how the coin first struck you, when you looked with your naked eye.

I'm not exactly sure what I will do in part lll and am open to some suggestions (I can't promise that I will be able to address what is requested but will try). I can tell you, that, while I know a number of people would like images and a discussion of cleaning (among other things), I don't have such pictures and, quite frankly, things like that are much better taught in person, face to face. My apologies that I can't help in that fashion. But, please feel free to ask questions, make comments, etc.

Comments

  • LucyBopLucyBop Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭
    another great post!!!!
    imageBe Bop A Lula!!
    "Senorita HepKitty"
    "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
  • LucyBopLucyBop Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭


    << <i>If you have questions about the most important areas for grading for a given type of coin, please feel free to ask. >>



    Your opinion on 2 coins, Winged Liberty dimes and Frankies...
    imageBe Bop A Lula!!
    "Senorita HepKitty"
    "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
  • I`ve read around the forums here about a year ago are so that white cotton gloves are perfered to handle raw coins. Would you agree are would there be something else you would recommend to use to handle raw coins? It`s off topic I know, and not doubting the advice given on the forums, but wanted to know for sure what the best way was.
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    CCR,

    Your post wasn't off topic, at all. It was right on, as a matter of fact.

    There is nothing wrong with wearing gloves, as far as I'm concerned. Some types might make it awkward to handle coins, though and, depending upon what they are made of, you could end up with lint, etc. on your coins. If you find some that you are comfortable with and want to use them, by all means, do so.
  • Thanks Mark!
    If you can, I'd like a comment on weak strike versus slight wear...
    I used to collect Buffalos and the branch mints were notorious for a weak strike. The same goes for Charlotte and Dahlonega gold...If this is too odd or un-needed that is fine, it was just something I wonder about often.
    John
  • leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,475 ✭✭✭✭✭
    EXAMINING COINS Now it's time to discuss examining/viewing coins properly. First, make sure you don't have your pet dog, cat (or snake) anywhere near where you will be studying your treasures. The same goes for babies and significant others - this is serious business and you need to be able to concentrate! Lighting has already been discussed but I did neglect to mention that blinds or shades should be drawn so that your light source is not interfered with by any outside light. If you have coins that are uncertified and completely out of any type of holder, I'd recommend that you have something soft and yielding (a towel, a felt tray, etc.) underneath where you will be holding the coins, in case you drop one (or two). The best/sharpest coin graders are not necessarily the most sure-handed! I do recommend that you remove uncertified coins from their 2x2's, etc., to get a proper look - even the thinnest layer of plastic can mask flaws and prevent you from getting the view that you should. Be conscious of how easy it is to put fingerprints on your beauties. I have seen a lot of people start off by holding coins at their edges, but gradually lose concentration and allow their long and or fat fingers to move from the edge to the surface of the coin. To get the best possible look at a coin it is imperative that you tilt and gradually rotate it so that the light bounces off of it from as many angles as possible. A coin can look completely different, if looked at head-on, vs. from an angle. Light reflects differently and colors and luster can look different, as well. You might see hairlines, cleaning, wipes or other problems from one angle that you wont see from another angle. Look at a coin from all angles, top to bottom, right side up, sideways and upside down, etc. This is a simple concept but you'd be surprised at the number of people who don't do it right. I know some graders who start off looking at the reverses of coins first just to get a different perspective. I know others who begin, looking at coins sideways instead of up and down, for the same reason. I don't usually do those things but it's probably a good idea to try it once in a while, just for a change in your routine. When you take your first look at a coin, do so without a glass/magnifier. Eyeball it for a few seconds on each side to get a general first impression - to see how it hits you. Don't worry, initially, about looking for flaws and problems - get a feel for the big picture and the eye-appeal or lack thereof. I cannot over-emphasize the fact, that in many cases, the first, split second look of a coin is extremely important. It will either grab your attention or not. If it doesn't, it might not be so special and it might not impress the next viewer, either. If it is special looking and grabs your attention right away, it very well might have the same effect on the next person. Many buying decisions regarding many valuable coins are made in a matter of seconds, based on that all-important first impression. Look at the focal points - the main design elements (the cheek on a Morgan dollar, Ms. Liberty on a Walking Liberty Half dollar, the Indian on Indian gold coinage, etc.) If you have questions about the most important areas for grading for a given type of coin, please feel free to ask. Next, look at the other areas, toward the borders. As you are doing this, you should be slowly and gradually rotating the coin and tilting it back and forth (as mentioned previously) at the same time - try to get the light to reflect off of the surface from as many angles as possible. Now, for those of you who are dying to do so, it is ok to pick up your magnifiers - go for it, but don't forget about how the coin first struck you, when you looked with your naked eye. I'm not exactly sure what I will do in part lll and am open to some suggestions (I can't promise that I will be able to address what is requested but will try). I can tell you, that, while I know a number of people would like images and a discussion of cleaning (among other things), I don't have such pictures and, quite frankly, things like that are much better taught in person, face to face. My apologies that I can't help in that fashion. But, please feel free to ask questions, make comments, etc. Mark Feld of Pinnacle Rarities

    Great stuff. Almost like forum therapy! I do believe that someone will come up with a way to mechanically
    turn a coin while an uploadable 15 second movie is made for an auction.

    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    Mark, your efforts will really go a long way in helping educate collectors. Thanks again.

    I want to emphasize one thing Mark said (primarily because it a problem for me, I guess). HAIRLINES! Learn to spot hairlines!

    Many of you remember Russ' post where he showed how a heavily hairlined coin can look flawless in a photo given certain lighting. It's the same when looking in person. You must make sure you have looked at the coin with light reflecting from ALL angles, or you could easily miss some hairlines. That could result in overestimating a coin by multiple grade points.

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    One question I have is how do you do some of this in places where the lighting is not controllable and all there is is fluorescent lights.
  • Mark; How does one determine the difference between a "Good" strike and a "Weak" strike? Let's use the Peace dollar as an example. Twowood
  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,321 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hi Mark...what's the big idea. I had to pay hundreds of dollars and spend three days away from home at an ANA grading seminar to get this stuff you're giving away for free image.
    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • I find more and more, I know if a coin is of interest to me in about the same amount of time that PCGS claims it takes to grade them. Now, I'm not saying I can accurately grade in that amount of time, I just usually get a feeling that quick if the coin is of any appeal to me.
    I'm a big believer in eyeballing the coin without a glass. I will put on my reading glasses these days though, or else all would be lost.

    But, I truly get most of the information I need just with the regular view. I am not however, a variety specialist, or the type of collector that actually has to use magnification to better pursue their areas of interest. The longer you collect a certain type of coin, certainly the more comfortable you get with a quick once/twice over assessment.

    I believe this strongly, the coins you love will usually speak to you right away. I have many times stared and stared at coins trying to convince myself I liked them. Inenvitably, I find if I have nagging doubts about a coin from the first look over, they will never go away. Sometimes trust your gut.

    Thanks for these threads, Mark. Keep them coming.

    Clankeye
    Brevity is the soul of wit. --William Shakespeare
  • You are very kind to take the time to share your knowledge through these posts....and I'm very appreciative. Thank you.
    Go well.


  • << <i>I have many times stared and stared at coins trying to convince myself I liked them. >>



    This happens to me more times than I care to admit. About half of the time I also ending up buying the coin I'm questioning, only to usually regret it later. I call this "coin show madness". image I'm so thrilled to find a coin that I NEED, I forget to be patient and wait until I find the one that I WANT. I'm going to a local show tomorrow, and after reading these threads, I'm going to walk into the show with a different mental state of mind.

    Mark, what percentage of the coins you see do you actually end up buying?

    Andy image
    We are finite beings, limited in all our powers, and, hence, our conclusions are not only relative, but they should ever be held subject to correction. Positive assurance is unattainable. The dogmatist is the only one who claims to possess absolute certainty.

    First POTD 9/19/05!!

  • rkfishrkfish Posts: 2,617 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Mark!

    I (and others) really appreciate you taking the time to share
    your wealth of knowledge......especially when it comes to grading!image
    Steve

    Check out my PQ selection of Morgan & Peace Dollars, and more at:
    WWW.PQDOLLARS.COM or WWW.GILBERTCOINS.COM
  • Catch22Catch22 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭
    My appologies for eluding to one area you did not cover, rims.....don't forget to look at the rims. I know, everyone assumes the rims would be inspected as well.....still.....

    Keep 'em coming, Mark. Thanks


    When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.

    Thomas Paine
  • know some graders who start off looking at the reverses of coins first just to get a different perspective. I know others who begin, looking at coins sideways instead of up and down, for the same reason. I don't usually do those things but it's probably a good idea to try it once in a while, just for a change in your routine.

    Coinguy1, this is the most bizzare thing I ever heard!! I can't wait to try it at this next lot preview!! image

    What needs to "grab" you when looking at gold? Silver can tone so many varied ways unlike gold. Also what do you first look at when examining a Liberty gold or a $2.5 / $5 Indian gold?

    As always, thanks for being so selfless with your time and knowledge, you are da'best!
  • Catch22Catch22 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭
    Mark, how about a quick thread on essential books and your personal choices for an aspiring numismatist? I know it's been discussed before, but how about a list of your top ten or so?


    When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.

    Thomas Paine
  • Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146
    Uh oh.!!!!!.What if everone becomes an expert grader and finds out most of the coins out there are WHIZZED!!!!!
    image
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    superb!!
    i also might add

    mark has posted these two exact coin grading coin topics part one and two on the ngccoin.com boards and therre were some great comments there and you might want to go over and take a look............. really informative especially so about one collecytor that found out after he got home with a coin that he didnot examine carefully that there was a surprise for him

    you might want to read that post on mark felds
    part two thread over and over again as this might help others avoid this common place occurance!

    as i have seen this happen many many many times over the years



    also mark hope you read my comments on the other boarda about dointg this part 3 and beyond and my suggestions on what to do to keep this an ongoing thing! i think it might help others make better informed decsisons !!
    and maybe this might be compioled in a future book! as for me right now with all this grading tyhing and how this effects greatly desirability and price!! this is really very important and anything like this which helps others make better informed decsisons in coins this helps evetryone in the long run and makes the hobby more effective and positive for many entering it at a fast pace and with this information you are posting it might make it a more positive thing for many and keep them here maybe longer and hopefully for a lifetime

    this coin thing! and mark feld!!!!!!!!!!!!! this should be the title!

    sincerely michael
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Look at a coin from all angles, top to bottom, right side up, sideways and upside down, etc >>



    Yes sir, now that's what I'm talking about!!!!!!
    So I guess when I have been looking at Barber Proofs for hairlines this way, and getting a stiff neck from from looking at the coin from all angles, I've been doing the right thing and not just being an old time grumpy tech grader like Dog97 calls me?image
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • Dog97Dog97 Posts: 7,874 ✭✭✭
    Here's the way I do it.......I was @ a show Sat and first of all I forgot to put on my belt and after a little while my pants stretched out & loosened up & slid down so I'm showing a big fat butt crack. I go up to the case, put my hands on my hips & stick my elbows way out to keep everybody else away from me and bend over with my head about 6" from the glass and rock from back & forth & sideways & all around. The nice coins have the little cartwheels going round & round in unison and make me dozzy eyed & dizzy and they just jump up at me while the cleaned ones just lay there like a dead fish. I kept banging my head on those pesky lights the dealers have hanging over the cases.
    Change that we can believe in is that change which is 90% silver.
  • LucyBopLucyBop Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭


    << <i>so I'm showing a big fat butt crack. >>



    Shucks! I missed it!
    imageBe Bop A Lula!!
    "Senorita HepKitty"
    "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
  • RGLRGL Posts: 3,784
    Thanks for another great post, Mark. Now, for Part III, may I suggest a discussion of grading factors and their relative importance to overall grade ... luster, toning, strike, severity and number of marks and their location, etc. But, ultimately, I think you hit it on the head regarding "special" coins with your observation about eye appeal immediately grabbing you.
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Mark, for a common sense explaination of the process. I always think of the first look as my emotional response to the coin. I am learning to give it more weight than the technical grade that comes on the second and third look. I haven't mastered hairlines yet, but I'm improving. Can you find them consistently without magnification? I have a rather harsh light that I occasionally use prior to submission that can make any coin look terrible, so I appreciate your lighting suggestions as well.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor


  • << <i>may I suggest a discussion of grading factors and their relative importance to overall grade ... luster, toning, strike, severity and number of marks and their location, etc. >>



    I agree! More please!

    Andy
    We are finite beings, limited in all our powers, and, hence, our conclusions are not only relative, but they should ever be held subject to correction. Positive assurance is unattainable. The dogmatist is the only one who claims to possess absolute certainty.

    First POTD 9/19/05!!

  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Here are some replies to questions/issues that have been raised in this thread:

    Johnscoin and Twowood - you asked about wear vs. weak strike. That is something that is much less difficult (notice I didn't say much easier!) to explain/teach in person. However, I will say that generally, wear will manifest itself in a slightly different color on the high points of a coin. It might appear darker on a copper coin or slightly white or grey looking on a gold coin, for example.

    It certainly helps to know the striking characteristics of a given coin, too. If you are dealing with/examining a coin that you know typically comes weakly struck, it will hopefully be easier not to confuse that weakness in strike, for wear. I also recommend looking for other telltale signs of circulation if you think you are seeing wear - look for disturbances in the fields (such as lots of small/fine circulation abrasions) and loss of luster.

    Twowood - with respect to knowing a good vs. a weak strike for a particular coin or issue (you mentioned Peace dollars) : the best advice I can give in that area is to find a good book in your main area(s) of interest and to examine as many certified coins as possible. Eventually, you should get a feel for which dates typically come well struck and which don't.

    Kranky mentioned hairlines - that seems to be one of the most difficult areas for many people. Once you learn how to properly examine a coin (without a magnifier, initially) by tilting and rotating it as described, so that the light bounces off of it at all angles, it will become easier to detect hairlines. Hairlines are often the determining grade factor on many Proof coins and can easily and often account for more than a one point difference in grade.

    nwcs - you asked what to do about poor lighting conditions. I would recommed that you find a small, portable lamp that you are comfortable with you can take to shows with you. Also, if you are at a table at a show and the lighting is poor - if there are covers on the tables, in order to drown out disturbing overhead light, you might be able to place part of the cover over your head and/or the lamp you are using at the table. It will look funny but can be very effective. There have been 2 or 3 times when the lighting at a show has been so bad that I literally took my lamp and crawled under a table to examine a valuable coin. Not recommended if you have a bad back or are wearing white pants! You could also use a book or something else to block the overhead light that is troubling you.

    pmh 1nic - I am glad that you are pleased with the free information I have provided. But, I assure you, the fee you pay for the ANA seminars is well worth it. I have taught the advanced grading class 2 or 3 times and been a visitor at the basic grading class as well. Whatever you have learned from me will be dwarfed by what you can learn in those classes. There are some great instructors who will be showing you lots of coins and discussing some of these very same issues. it is much easier and more efficient to do this stuff when you have coins in front of you that you can examine, discuss and pass back and forth.

    Clankeye and a few others have commented about trying to convince themselves to like or keep a particular coin. Don't do that. If the coin is not unique or irreplaceable (very few are), don't talk yourself into it - pass on it. I have given the same advice to many clients of ours, as well - really!

    Android/Andy - you asked what percentage of the coins that I see, do I buy. The percentage is very small, for a couple of reasons. First, many people do not handle the type and quality of coins that we do, so I have to look through boxes and boxes (and through many display cases) just to locate coins that might fit the bill. Then, of those that I do find, many are not suitable for my subjective standards of grade and eye-appeal, taking into account the type of material we want to be able to offer to our clients.

    As an example, I would guess that we purchased approximately 100 new coins at the FUN show. We no doubt looked through many thousands of coins to come up with those.

    Catch22 - you mentioned that people should examine the rims of coins - good catch! I neglected that and I apologize. Many coins which might be wonderful in every other way, have rim problems. You also asked about recommend books. There have been a number of good threads on that topic - perhaps someone could link them or send a P.M to you.

    DesertLizard - you asked what grabs me when I'm looking at gold coins, which don't tone like silver does. I love the occasionally found gold coin with that lovely, subtle rose hue to it and those with a golden-orange patina/hue. I also like flashy, prooflike pieces and those with great luster and exceptionally clean surfaces. For the older (pre 1839) types, I look for original pieces that haven't been cleaned or altered - that leaves me liking a very low percentage of the available population!

    On another note, be sure to let me know how your next lot preview goes!image

    Michael - as always, thanks for your enthusiasm and support. But, no books for me!

    Everyone, please feel free to keep the questions and comments coming and I will attempt to respond as best I can.
  • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    Mark,

    Here's a question that I would like as detailed a response as possible. Of the four grading factors; Luster, strike, surface preservation, and marks, how are they ranked and how much do they effect the grade? What about coins with no marks, yet poor strike? Great luster, but very baggy?

    Tom
    Tom

  • Mark,

    Do you have a personal coin collection? Or do you just find coins for your clients?

    Andy image
    We are finite beings, limited in all our powers, and, hence, our conclusions are not only relative, but they should ever be held subject to correction. Positive assurance is unattainable. The dogmatist is the only one who claims to possess absolute certainty.

    First POTD 9/19/05!!

  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    More replies:

    stman - sorry about your stiff neck but you must be doing something right! Remember, though - you can move the coin and keep your neck still. image

    Dog - your technique sounds fine but PLEASE wear a belt next time! image

    Don - yes, you can learn to recognize hairlines consistently, without magnification. As a matter of fact, if you try it without a glass you might even have a better chance. When you aren't concerned about trying to view an isolated part of a coin with magnification, you have the opportunity to move the coin around while still getting a look at the entire surface and thereby increase your odds.

    THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF FACTORS THAT GO INTO GRADING

    A number of you have asked about this - the relative importance of the various factors that go into grading - things like luster, strike, toning and marks, including their location and severity.

    I can almost guarantee you, that you will get different answers/rankings if you ask different people. However, I firmly believe that EYE-APPEAL is, by far, THE most important factor. And, why shouldn't it be? It is comprised of a number of the different components of grading, anyway. Eye appeal includes things like color, luster, how your eye is affected by abrasions and/or weak strike, etc. In other words, the grading determinants other than eye-appeal are actually components of eye-appeal - eye-appeal is the big picture. Don't sell it short.

    Regarding the other factors that go into grading - I think that their importance can differ from coin to coin and from coin type to coin type.

    For example, strike is often the key issue with Buffalo nickels and some Walking Liberty half dollars, among others.

    Any coin, no matter how clean or well struck, if lacking sufficient luster, should be down graded accordingly.

    Likewise, no matter how lustrous, pretty and well struck a coin is, if it is peppered with contact marks, the grade is affected. The number, severity AND location of marks/abrasions can make a difference. That is one reason why I don't think books can be very helpful for the grading of mint state coinage. If a book tells you a con is MS63 if it has such and such number of marks, that doesn't do you much good. Why? Because one large mark in the wrong place, can hurt/affect the grade more than several small ones that are well hidden.

    The key is to weigh all of the factors that go into grading and not give too much weight to one, at the expense of the others. Don't focus just on the one negative you might find - give credit for the positive features.

    If a coin is beautiful and perfect except for one minor but noticeable abrasion or imperfection, don't knock it down in grade from 70 to 65 just for that one flaw. That's probably not fair or accurate.

    Andy, in answer to your question - I currently have only two coins in my collection. I like and want to own many coins that I see. But, I try to avoid buying most of them because I do have a collector mentality and want to avoid any conflicts and make sure I don't lose focus for my work (which I truly enjoy). I hope that made sense!
  • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    Great response, Mark. How about some big, blown up pictures of some coins as the grade goes from MS-60 to MS-67, say Indian Cents or seated liberty half dollars where we can see the "eye appeal" changes to increasing better conditions? Often pictures speak louder than words. Choose something other than Morgan dollars or Walking Liberty halves, if possible.

    Tom
    Tom

  • Mark & Fellow members,
    Great Post, great replies.
    I had taken a one year break from Numismatics, and This board is helping get me back up to speed with what's happening in the hobby. As usual, grading is always a hot topic. Nice to know some things never change.image
    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    suggestion regarding the "white cotton gloves": don't do it. early on , i was using 'em, & discovered that what happens is you grip the coin properly by the edges - but it squirts from out between your fingers, ie a lack of grip on the coin.

    terrific posts, mark. appreciate your efforts.

    K S
  • TrimeTrime Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭
    Just an addentum to Marks outstanding posts:
    I strongly support Mark's recommendation to take the grading courses at the ANA Summer Session; if you think this is helpful imagine 5 days with Mark and his peers going over thousands of coins and having each critiqued by these experienced graders. The fun parts come when there are disagreements about appropriate grade and the discussions that ensue. Read Kranky's threads of his last year experience (archives) for a preview. In addition you meet the greats, near greats and other collectors of coins. Great experience. Keep your ego at home and you will learn lots.
    Eye appeal is hard to discus. You know what looks good to you and Mark knows from experience what appeals to most of his clients and peers but you may have a different eye. Most of us agree on the extremes :'Beautiful"; "Ugly" but in between well ....Note the differences in opinion on topics of toning.
    Thanks again Mark for your contributions to this board and my knowledge .


    Trime
  • LokiLoki Posts: 897 ✭✭
    I like no-powder rubber surgical gloves. They have excellent grip control and are lint-free. Also, you can blow them up and make a "rooster' balloon for your kids when you are done with them. image
  • zennyzenny Posts: 1,547 ✭✭


    << <i>Andy, in answer to your question - I currently have only two coins in my collection. I like and want to own many coins that I see. But, I try to avoid buying most of them because I do have a collector mentality and want to avoid any conflicts and make sure I don't lose focus for my work (which I truly enjoy). I hope that made sense! >>



    Mark
    thanks for the interesting and informative post, as always, and of course now the inquiring minds are wanting to know ----- exactly which two coins ??????????????????
    thanks
    z
  • I have seen Mark's two coins. One is a dateless Buffalo nickel, with "Bob" carved into the reverse, and the other is a 1952-P Washington Carver commem graded MS 68 by ACG. Mark is pretty sure that one is rare.

    Clankeye
    Brevity is the soul of wit. --William Shakespeare
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    I had been considering bringing this and Basic Grading Tips Part l back to the top, in order that some of the newer forum members have an opportunity (or be forced image) to see them. Russ's recent revival of his thread about lighting, gave me the courage and inspiration to take the plunge, so to the top....

    Edited to add: If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask them here or send them to me by PM. I will do my best to answer any which I receive.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Mark,

    I'm glad I was able to stiffen your resolve. image

    PS: This is one of my bookmarked threads that I refer to quite frequently.

    Russ, NCNE
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    ttt
  • FlashFlash Posts: 1,090 ✭✭✭
    ttt again
    Matt
  • Just read both threads...thanks a bunch for posting them.
    Alpha Mike Foxtrot
  • ttt
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    I resent the implication that I have long fat fingers. As we all know, bears dont really have fingers,

    we have paws. Whos paw do you think was used to model the Boyds Bears paw print logo?image
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    TTT, as some of this stuff has come up for discussion recently.image
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    TTT for the newbies (or the "oldbies", who might be so old that they have forgotten)image
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    image
  • ldhairldhair Posts: 7,304 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks Mark.
    I missed part 2 the first time around.

    Reading these threads got me thinking.
    I need to slow down a bit when I'm grading.
    I rush things and probably shouldn't.

    Larry

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file