Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1835 Capped Bust half dime (w/grading poll)

lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,271 ✭✭✭✭✭
This coin was the subject of an earlier thread.

It was my sixth purchase for the new 19th century VF-XF Basic Type Set (which is up to eleven coins now as of this post).

I initially had my doubts about it, but after the commentary of some half dime specialist folks and now seeing it in hand, my doubts have been put to rest and I must say I am quite pleased with it. Particularly as I was able to produce a much better set of pictures with my scanner than the seller did with his camera. Of course he was shooting through a dusty 2x2 holder. I've got a higher-end scanner and it actually does pretty nice coin pictures (for a scanner), but only on "crusty" circulated coins. It's less optimal on coins with colorful toning, and if there is bright luster or proof/prooflike mirrors, you can forget about it. The folks with a good camera setup will beat a scanner any day of the week, but I'm actually pretty proud of how this set of scans turned out.




image

Larger obverse picture

Larger reverse picture

PCGS/Photograde standards

Index of similar grading poll threads like this




Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.

Comments

  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,271 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I went for the neutral poll option again.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • Options
    Hi LM,

    Those surfaces. Perhaps the scanner.

    Best,
    Eric
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,271 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe the scanner, maybe not. Like I said, it's got a gunmetal, semi-iridescent sheen to the blacker toning.

    Might grade, might not, at a TPG. I don't care. I like it. It's very CircCam.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,271 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Bump for the midday crowd.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • Options
    IrishMikeyIrishMikey Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭
    I voted VF-25 on this one. Assuming that the images accurately represent the coin, I think it is
    a great circulated example. So many have been cleaned or worked on.

    No one is using the VG-8 option with your polls anymore. Did they give up?
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,569 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I voted "genuine, no grade, problem coin." The surfaces are corroded and rough. Although you see corrosion far more often on copper coins, silver coins are not immune. This one has VF sharpness, but it will not grade because of the environmental damage.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I disagree with the sentiments expressed in the other thread; I think this coin is a real VF20. I do agree about the environmental damage, however some judicious conservation should make some if not most of it go away without negatively impacting eye appeal.

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • Options
    rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,621 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I was borderline F15 or VF20 on this one, but went with VF20. There is just enough drapery detail to get it to slab VF. The coin has a pleasing look overall, though the toning is a tad darker than some people would like. The wear on the eagle's wings almost made me say it's F15, but I think it has enough meat to squeak out the 20. With the face being as flat as it is, and with heavy wear throughout, I find it difficult to stretch to VF30 or 35 as some folks have. The coin has a pleasing overall look, and I like it as a VF Type set addition.
  • Options
    I also agree that coin could be F15 or VF20 (for the obverse), but I went with the F15 because of the weak wings on the reverse. The coin could use a little work...some residual PVC or other crud that could easily be removed.
    Successful Transactions With: PRoemisch, WTCG, CCFC, barberkeys, lkeigwin, ElmerFusterpuck, 123cents, coin22lover, coinlieutenant and abitofthisabitofthat

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file