Search
-
I'm always fascinated when a coin cataloguer has to describe an ugly high grade
One of my perverse thrills in this hobby is reading the coin copy of obviously ugly coins by astute major auction house cataloguers. These guys/gals earn their keep in spades, it's the toughest job in the business. For every great coin that brings out the best in them, like this, there are so many coins like this. 1864 1C… -
Re: I'm always fascinated when a coin cataloguer has to describe an ugly high grade
-
Re: I'm always fascinated when a coin cataloguer has to describe an ugly high grade
My favorite comment is to the effect that the coin should be viewed by the prospective bidder (to see if he still wants to bid on the coin after actually seeing it). -
Re: I'm always fascinated when a coin cataloguer has to describe an ugly high grade
"For pedigree purposes..." is always a bad sign. -
Re: I'm always fascinated when a coin cataloguer has to describe an ugly high grade
<< <i>Eeeeewwww. WTF is that? >> That? That, my friend, is a vomiting Mr. Creosote. Not a Python fan apparently. Oh, wait! You're an ANACONDA fan! -
Re: I'm always fascinated when a coin cataloguer has to describe an ugly high grade
Should we worry that the NGC hologram label has been scraped off? Almost like designer clothes with the labels cut out... -
Re: I'm always fascinated when a coin cataloguer has to describe an ugly high grade
No mention of the obverse die clash either...and I've never seen whatever that is in the "O" in "OF".
8 results