Search
-
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
I have been trying to avoid getting to involved in the weighting discussions, partly because its not really an exact science and as long as the main cards are right, I'm not too fussed about the others. Here are some of my thoughts: 1) I agree that the starting point for the A/B/U weights should be the same and by… -
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
Hi All, I don't really have too much to add that I haven't already posted before (thanks for the link, Michael). My reason for chiming in is to give you all a little "heads up" in case you were unaware. PSA is currently revisiting the whole 1-10 weighting system and asking for Registry member input. Specifically, they are… -
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
The delay in adding a card to the Pop Report is cool when you get the first 10 of a card; Grade = 10 Pop = 1/0 That's right, there's none like it... Take it easy, Jared PS - I was going to mention Tony's Pestilence, but I wasn't sure if some trading had been going on. Remember, "he who controls the Pestilence controls the… -
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
Hello Jared, Blaze of Glory: I missed this one. You're right, it should be a 2 (OOP rare). Cyclopean Tomb: It's OOP, but sucks; 2 is about right. I don t think this card sucks LOL ! (at least lot less that the giant and the blaze) Demonic Tutor: High demand card, 2 is good (like Sol Ring and Icy). OK Mahamoti Djinn: I know… -
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
I wonder if it will be ever possible to make 1 PSA 10 beta set ... Gratz Steven this set is the best set ever puted together all set included. I noticed that it could be possible to make an alpha set Rating of 9.74 !!! but with Rudy /Len /Jake that own 95 % of the cards needed to make it even if someone put 100 000 USD on… -
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
My set went down 12 points! I demand them back! Hm, is there something wrong with the calculations? My set was at 2.03, now it's 1.91 - and the only card that decreased for me was the Berserk which went from 3 to 2. My Mana vault went from 1 to 2, Underground Sea from 2 to 4, and the Moxes/power stayed the same..anything… -
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
Set Registry Rules Relevant Bits "Grade Points, Set Ratings and Weighting Set rankings are determined by the grades of the items in the set, the "weight" assigned to each item in the set, and the set's completeness. Each item within the set is assigned a item rating based on the value of the item in NM-MT condition. For… -
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
Yes i agree the scale to keep scale 1-10 maximum is better so poeple will collect the whole set not only the P9. So Len just give me the Lotus thing you keep posting on this chat i will give you some common to help you complete your set Yes i agree to for exemple to me shivan is more close to the badland than to the… -
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
Hey Bastien, Blaze of Glory: I missed this one. You're right, it should be a 2 (OOP rare). Cyclopean Tomb: It's OOP, but sucks; 2 is about right. Demonic Tutor: High demand card, 2 is good (like Sol Ring and Icy). Mahamoti Djinn: I know you love this card, but it really isn't a high demand card now. Perhaps Force of Nature… -
Re: MTG: Alpha Set Weighting
I'm going to be revisiting this. It's just not sitting right with me, and it looks like the idea of reweighting Alpha is stalling. In my opinion, if you're going to weight a set like the Alphas, which is a great idea, you really need to do it right. Especially considering vast difference in print runs of the rares versus…
26 results