jerseycat101 ✭✭✭✭✭

I couldn't disagree with @EXOJUNKIE more. For starters, I didn't know that jakesmp.com existed, now I do. Also, I now know that he somewhat cares about his perception from a customer service point of… (View Post)

I find it hard to believe a modern coin of that composition tones that nicely naturally. (View Post)

No. Too much chatter in the fields (and on the cheek) for a 67. Not to mention the fingerprint. (View Post)

I'd say based on the poor pictures, that it's a PQ 64. (View Post)

That reverse is pretty nice. (View Post)