-
SMR Article on 1969 Topps 4 in 1--2 board members quoted
ok--I am 1 of them. Bob Fisk is the other. Like I have said before anytime I can be mentioned in the same sentence as Bob in the collecting world I am honored. Bob we have another article coming up o… (View Post)3 -
Re: And then there were none . . . 1954 Topps Baseball Complete in PSA 4 / 5 / 6
nice job and congrats! Surprising to see so many '54 set collectors with you being at 64 (View Post)2 -
Re: How important is FASC?
There is some debate on what type of premium should be placed on a box that is designated as FASC. Prior threads have pegged it at 15-20% premium over the going rate for a non-FASC box. I think it sh… (View Post)1 -
Re: Cost of Wax Packs 25 Years Ago
true story. I started collecting unopened in the mid 90s. Many packs from Mr. Mint--like this one--that I paid $150 for (View Post)7 -
Re: This Hammer price is stunning; '76 #1 Registry; only $35K less than #1 '65 set; sold on same day
1965 for me. I sold my partially graded--but hi grade set--last year to help buy an engagement ring. Now that I am no longer engaged--I am putting together an even higher graded set--PSA8 and 9--just… (View Post)3
