TomB ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Is This the Earliest Invoice Number You've Seen on an NGC Holder?
Green was never used despite what some folks have written previously. I have spoken to JA directly and he has told me that green seen on these is dye degradation likely from UV light and JA also publ… (View Post)11 -
Re: Is This the Earliest Invoice Number You've Seen on an NGC Holder?
It's the lowest number I have seen, but it isn't the earliest slab. (View Post)4 -
Re: GC has another misattributed cent up for auction. This time it's an 1877 called "MS"
If I were the consignor of that coin I would not allow PCGS to reholder it as MS in a new holder. It would either stay in the old holder as MS or I would allow PCGS to buy me out of the coin with it … (View Post)8 -
Re: This must be gorgeous in hand
No, I haven't, and I realize my own thoughts on this are problematic and I have not seen the coin in-hand. I could absolutely be wrong. (View Post)1 -
Re: GTG 1795 Half. Grade Posted.
I love the coin, but wouldn't be surprised if it had received a details grade for scratch or graffiti. (View Post)3
