-
Re: Been years since my last post but this is warranted
I recall early BGS (subgrades on the back) being the toughest graders. Even BVG, when it first started, was extremely tough (especially on corners and edges). Dr Beckett has acknowledged these points… (View Post)2 -
Re: Can anyone point to the change in PSA grading? Was there a material change to standards in writing?
I recently sent three 3 PSA 9 1972 #445 Seaver's for regrade. Two came back 8, one 7. A 1977 #150 Seaver 9 for regrade came back a 6. A 1973 #350 Seaver 9 for regrade came back 8. Thought they had a … (View Post)1 -
Re: Damaged card
That's a tough story. Sorry to hear. Any really good cards damaged? I had a similar experience with BGS with a 67 Seaver. I always wondered if cards could be damaged (micro or macro damaged) by just … (View Post)1 -
Re: Grading with CSG through PWCC
Back in the day, didn't GAI try to set up similar deals with big time dealers? I believe folks were not pleased with this concept and the potential preferential grading issues. Just my recollection..… (View Post)1 -
Toughest 1985 Topps Baseball Cards....
Many thousands of these cards have been graded already, mostly due to the big four rookies (Mcgwire, Puckett, Clemens and Gooden) but many others are really tough.... Centering was absolutely terribl… (View Post)1
