-
Re: “IN GOD WE TRUST 2.0”
I have tried to be polite and respectful. There is a group of members who clearly don’t think this should be discussed or allowed. I’m disappointed that, instead of simply going elsewhere or contribu… (View Post)2 -
Re: “IN GOD WE TRUST 2.0”
You assume a lot about what I do and don’t know. While I can’t accurately quote most of the pertinent sources, I am familiar with them, and have valid opinions based on many reputable sources. My new… (View Post)1 -
Re: “IN GOD WE TRUST 2.0”
Why this unnecessary undercurrent of veiled threats? I believe I have been civil, and accurate in what I say, and clearly some members find it interesting and have good contributions. But there seems… (View Post)3 -
Re: “IN GOD WE TRUST 2.0”
Insider2 says: “You need to read the original writings from the old men who actually discussed these things before several generations of our (you and I) ancestors were born.” Our founding fathers we… (View Post)3 -
Re: “IN GOD WE TRUST 2.0”
It almost seems as if you are trying to pick a fight, exactly what I had hoped no one would do, to demonstrate to moderators that members were capable of civil discourse on controversial subjects. I … (View Post)2