-
Re: Disappointed in this grade!
There's a dramatic difference between these two coins, the 1960 doesn't show a hint of reflection on the devices, whereas the 1963 does all over the portrait: (View Post)1 -
Re: Disappointed in this grade!
Compare Franklin's cheek and hair on both coins. You can see the texture of the frost on the 1960...thus the cameo designation. The surface of the portrait on the 1963 is smooth in your photo, and I … (View Post)4 -
Re: Disappointed in this grade!
I'm not surprised to see it didn't get a CAM designation. 1963's come with monster thick frost, so the standard is going to be a bit more stringent. The frost on both sides appears to be less than th… (View Post)3 -
Re: My first PCGS submission results since pre-COVID
All of these were raw purchases out of original sets. This submission represents thousands of sets searched. (View Post)1 -
Re: My first PCGS submission results since pre-COVID
No they didn't, I'd requested variety service for those 2, but it must have been overlooked on the submission form. At least, they didn't charge me for the variety service, but I also didn't get the … (View Post)1
