Mark ✭✭✭✭✭

I was there on Friday for a few hours. I had a very enjoyable chat with @Davidk7 at Peak Rarities. He even managed to interest my non-numismatic friend I went with in some coins. Amazing. I was looki… (View Post)

I'll go 66+. For a BTW the cheek looks cleanerthan most. But I wonder about the haze (?) on the right obverse. It's hard to tell if that's haze or a reflection from perhaps some polish… (View Post)

@BillJones I really liked your article on The Wealth of the South CWTs. It was a fun read and I learned from it. Thanks. (View Post)

Here is a 1918-D MS65FB dime with some toning. While I think it's OK, with respect to the toning, it's not my favorite. For the rarity, however, I like it. Not as rare but I prefer the toni… (View Post)

I have pictures of only two of my proof halves. And one of the pictures, the 1936, is a truly miserable TrueView. The actual coin is much prettier. Anyway, the 1936 is PR 67 and the 1939 is PR 67+ an… (View Post)