Does this PSA Flip look ok?

Typical red flags - seller with little history, suddenly selling high end cards...I asked for a scan of the back of the card.
1957 Mays
1957 Mays
Collecting all things Pittsburgh.
Completed my Clemente Basic Registry (2007 - 2014)!
Positive transactions with oakesy25,jasoneggert,swartz1,MBMiller25,gregm13,kid4hof03,HoopGuru33,Reese3333,BPorter26,Davemri,CuseSteve,Geoff76
Completed my Clemente Basic Registry (2007 - 2014)!
Positive transactions with oakesy25,jasoneggert,swartz1,MBMiller25,gregm13,kid4hof03,HoopGuru33,Reese3333,BPorter26,Davemri,CuseSteve,Geoff76
0
Comments
"Molon Labe"
Too many things working against them, I would not bid...Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
<< <i>The flip is fine. Same goes for the other cards. The scans are all uniform (as opposed to looking like they're from different scanners), which is always a good sign. I would have no problem bidding on this seller's cards. Should be a good opportunity to score some bargains. Keep in mind, a seller with a 9 rating probably hasn't learned yet that scanning card backs, and against a black background, are important to buyers. Given the PP buyer protection, what do you have to lose? >>
If the case is tampered with or a seller sends you a different card (both happened to me), PP protection is useless. For a tampered case you would need to send it into the grading company for an opinion. PSA is pretty good about it but they do break the card out of the holder. If they send you a different card, you need to get an "expert" opinion that.
To me it's not worth the risk.
<< <i>
<< <i>The flip is fine. Same goes for the other cards. The scans are all uniform (as opposed to looking like they're from different scanners), which is always a good sign. I would have no problem bidding on this seller's cards. Should be a good opportunity to score some bargains. Keep in mind, a seller with a 9 rating probably hasn't learned yet that scanning card backs, and against a black background, are important to buyers. Given the PP buyer protection, what do you have to lose? >>
If the case is tampered with or a seller sends you a different card (both happened to me), PP protection is useless. For a tampered case you would need to send it into the grading company for an opinion. PSA is pretty good about it but they do break the card out of the holder. If they send you a different card, you need to get an "expert" opinion that.
To me it's not worth the risk. >>
I once bought a Gretzky RC that had been tampered with. I filed a dispute claiming that the holder had been breached and this was not disclosed. Paypal ruled in my favor once I provided evidence that the card had been returned. So, in my experience, PP buyer's protection does work for breached holders.
"I Had a friend take pics. he is out of town. I can only tell you the card is original and unaltered. PSA wouldnt play any games. they are the franklin mint of cards. had the card since 1978"
Completed my Clemente Basic Registry (2007 - 2014)!
Positive transactions with oakesy25,jasoneggert,swartz1,MBMiller25,gregm13,kid4hof03,HoopGuru33,Reese3333,BPorter26,Davemri,CuseSteve,Geoff76
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>The flip is fine. Same goes for the other cards. The scans are all uniform (as opposed to looking like they're from different scanners), which is always a good sign. I would have no problem bidding on this seller's cards. Should be a good opportunity to score some bargains. Keep in mind, a seller with a 9 rating probably hasn't learned yet that scanning card backs, and against a black background, are important to buyers. Given the PP buyer protection, what do you have to lose? >>
If the case is tampered with or a seller sends you a different card (both happened to me), PP protection is useless. For a tampered case you would need to send it into the grading company for an opinion. PSA is pretty good about it but they do break the card out of the holder. If they send you a different card, you need to get an "expert" opinion that.
To me it's not worth the risk. >>
I once bought a Gretzky RC that had been tampered with. I filed a dispute claiming that the holder had been breached and this was not disclosed. Paypal ruled in my favor once I provided evidence that the card had been returned. So, in my experience, PP buyer's protection does work for breached holders. >>
I agree that PP works for tampered cases once you have the evidence. My point is that the buyer has to do all of the work in order to get the money back. It's not like a SNAD or non-delivery, which is pretty easy to get a claim paid.
I had to send the card to PSA in order to get the evidence, basically a letter from PSA. The buyer doesn't get compensated for the cost of doing that. PP wouldn't take photos as evidence.
Believe me I've used PP protection many times and it has worked for me as well, but I would rather just avoid the risk all together.
<< <i>The seller's response when I asked for a scan of the back of the Mays:
"I Had a friend take pics. he is out of town. I can only tell you the card is original and unaltered. PSA wouldnt play any games. they are the franklin mint of cards. had the card since 1978" >>
email him this link... Look man!
If the case is tampered with or a seller sends you a different card (both happened to me), PP protection is useless. For a tampered case you would need to send it into the grading company for an opinion. PSA is pretty good about it but they do break the card out of the holder. If they send you a different card, you need to get an "expert" opinion that.
To me it's not worth the risk.
At this point, you can pretty much use any reason for a SNAD claim, and Paypal will instruct you to return the item to the seller for a full refund.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.