Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

EOT on '71 baseball, now what? Need help!

Had all of these come back EOT, a very humbling experience to see the results for the first time. Thoughts, prayers, sympathy? Although one of my Dad's favorite lines is, "you know were you can find sympathy in the dictionary? Between "Sh*t and Syphilis." I put up big scans so maybe someone can point the trimmage out to me because obviously I missed something. I loved these cards too, boo hoo. Thanks. Doug

image
image
image
image

Comments

  • storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭

    I'd try again.

    Without holding them in hand, it is hard to say "for sure,"
    but they look pretty OK to me.

    If they measure and don't have even upward/downward
    descending edges, I would just resubmit them.

    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
  • hammeredhammered Posts: 2,671 ✭✭✭
    Some of those corners look a little too sharp to me, ie the upper right on Hodges
    Maybe that's a red flag for them?
  • What's the history of the cards? Where'd you get them, I mean?

    They still look like very nice cards, you can still love them even if PSA doesn't. image
    Collecting: non-sports (celebrities, movies, tv, Batman, Wrestling & Wrestling Divas, & more), and sports (Spurs, Cowboys, Braves and other favorites)

    My eBay Store: Chosen Point's Heroic Diversions eBay Store
  • BunkerBunker Posts: 3,926
    That sucks!

    The upper left corner of the Josephson looks a little off unless it is the scanner.
    image

    My daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 2 (2003). My son was diagnosed with Type 1 when he was 17 on December 31, 2009. We were stunned that another child of ours had been diagnosed. Please, if you don't have a favorite charity, consider giving to the JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation)

    JDRF Donation
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,568 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Do they pass the finger test? You can tell better by rubbing your finger along the length of each edge as well or better than you can tell with your eyes. I hate to say it but, my eyes tell me a couple do look off - but I'd have way more faith in my finger than my eyes.
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • augustamanaugustaman Posts: 586 ✭✭
    By looking at the Dean/Fuentes cards next to each other,
    they appear even height at the top but the Fuentes
    card appears to be much shorter at the bottom.

    Put one on top of the other to get a better idea.
    Bill
    wpkoughan@yahoo.com
    Collecting 1970-1979 PSA 9 & 10 Baseball Cards
  • bkingbking Posts: 3,095 ✭✭


    << <i>By looking at the Dean/Fuentes cards next to each other,
    they appear even height at the top but the Fuentes
    card appears to be much shorter at the bottom.

    Put one on top of the other to get a better idea. >>



    Yeah, that Fuentes looks a lot shorter than the Dean. Have you measured them? Also, the Finger test is a good idea. look at the four edges under at least a 4x lens and see if thye all look like the same sort of edge.
    ----------------------
    Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
    ----------------------

    Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    not unusual for a short Topps factory cut on those, so they might grade if re-subbed, but do only a couple at a time if it's even worth the effort.....i have successfully re-subbed a few which i swore measured up and they did.

    agree with finger-testing and examination under a loupe to detect a border cut which looks too precise, then an Exacto blade probably did that.....good luck Doug.
  • clearly trimmed
  • Thanks for the responses guys. I did do a finger test on these and they seemed to have the regular roughness feel to them, and not the slick "cut" feel. Here's the deal with all but maybe the Fuentes

    card. I purchased these along with about 30 other '71s back in the mid-90s from a mail order card dealer out of Minnesota. I believe Minnesota Sports cards or something like that but not completely

    sure on the name. I've been a little leary to even attempt to send the others in after these results. They are all from the same place and come back EOT, I'm afraid they might all be tampered with. Kind

    of ticks me off that I've had them all this time thinking they will be in my '71 set forever and now could be worthless. Thanks again for your thoughts. Doug
  • scotgrebscotgreb Posts: 809 ✭✭✭
    Doug --

    An easy way to check for (poorly) trimmed cards, is to hold the edges against a hard, flat surface (I use my desk) -- if it doesn't sit flat -- it's likely been trimmed.

    Better trim jobs are tougher to spot and the above method does not catch edges that have been well-trimmed the entire length.

    Hope this helps,
    Scott
  • take a 10X loupe look at the edges real close, if they black chips on the edge of the card or one edge the grain runs different than the other edges probably trimmed, sort of like looking at the edge to see if the black marker bleed through on a recolor job. plus what other people have said.

    if they still look good to you, send a just a couple of those back with your next submission. JMHO
  • I doubt those cards were trimmed.
  • RonBurgundyRonBurgundy Posts: 5,491 ✭✭✭
    If the grade don't fit, resubmit!
    Ron Burgundy

    Buying Vintage, all sports.
    Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
  • Mickey71Mickey71 Posts: 4,263 ✭✭✭✭
    Nothing jumps out to me. They are all over the place on 71's.
Sign In or Register to comment.